Pape Ulrich-Frank, Kasper Stefan, Meiler Johannes, Sinn Marianne, Vogel Arndt, Müller Lothar, Burkhard Oswald, Caca Karel, Heeg Steffen, Büchner-Steudel Petra, Rodriguez-Laval Victor, Kühl Anja A, Arsenic Ruza, Jansen Holger, Treasure Peter, Utku Nalân
Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Charité Mitte and Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Germany and Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Asklepios Tumorzentrum, Hamburg ATZHH, 20099 Hamburg, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Oct 27;12(11):3149. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113149.
CAP7.1 is a novel topoisomerase II inhibitor, converted to active etoposide via carboxylesterase 2 (CES2), with signals of efficacy in treatment-refractory solid tumours. In a Phase II trial, 27 patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTC) were randomised 1:1 to CAP7.1 plus best supportive care (BSC), or BSC alone, with crossover to CAP7.1 upon disease progression. The primary objective was disease control rate (DCR) following 28-day cycles of CAP7.1 (200/150 mg/m; iv), or BSC until progression. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS) and safety. Fourteen patients received CAP7.1 and 13 BSC. DCR favoured CAP7.1 vs. BSC (50% vs. 20%; treatment difference: 30%, 95%CI -18.44, 69.22, full analysis set [FAS]), with disease progression in 40% vs. 70%, respectively. Significantly longer median PFS was achieved for CAP7.1 vs. BSC: 66 vs. 39 days, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.31; 95%CI 0.11, 0.86; = 0.009; FAS). Similar trends were observed for TTF and OS. CES2-positive patients had longer median PFS (158 vs. 56 days) and OS (228 vs. 82 days) vs. CES2-negative patients. Adverse events were predictable, dose-dependent and consistent with those previously observed with etoposide. These efficacy and safety findings in second-line BTC warrant further clinical investigation of CAP7.1.
CAP7.1是一种新型拓扑异构酶II抑制剂,可通过羧酸酯酶2(CES2)转化为活性依托泊苷,在治疗难治性实体瘤方面显示出疗效信号。在一项II期试验中,27例晚期胆管癌(BTC)患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受CAP7.1加最佳支持治疗(BSC)或单纯BSC,疾病进展时交叉接受CAP7.1治疗。主要目标是在28天的CAP7.1(200/150mg/m²;静脉注射)周期或直至疾病进展的BSC治疗后的疾病控制率(DCR)。次要目标包括无进展生存期(PFS)、治疗失败时间(TTF)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。14例患者接受CAP7.1治疗,13例接受BSC治疗。与BSC相比,DCR更倾向于CAP7.1(50%对20%;治疗差异:30%,95%CI -18.44,69.22,全分析集[FAS]),疾病进展率分别为40%和70%。CAP7.1组的中位PFS明显长于BSC组:分别为66天和39天(风险比[HR] 0.31;95%CI 0.11,0.86;P = 0.009;FAS)。在TTF和OS方面也观察到类似趋势。与CES2阴性患者相比,CES2阳性患者的中位PFS(158天对56天)和OS(228天对82天)更长。不良事件是可预测的、剂量依赖性的,并且与之前依托泊苷观察到的一致。这些二线BTC的疗效和安全性发现值得对CAP7.1进行进一步的临床研究。