Scullen Tyler, Mathkour Mansour, Carr Christopher, Wang Arthur, Amenta Peter S, Nerva John D, Dumont Aaron S
Department of Neurological Surgery, Tulane Medical Center, New Orleans, LA 70130, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, Jefferson, LA 70121, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):3460. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113460.
Patient selection for endovascular intervention in extracranial carotid disease is centered on vascular anatomy. We review anatomical considerations for non-traumatic disease and offer guidelines in patient selection and management. We conducted a systematic literature review without meta-analysis for studies involving anatomical considerations in extracranial carotid intervention for non-traumatic disease. Anatomical considerations discussed included aortic arch variants, degree of vessel stenosis, angulation, tortuosity, and anomalous origins, and atheromatous plaque morphology, composition, and location. Available literature suggests that anatomical risks of morbidity are largely secondary to increased procedural times and difficulties in intervention system delivery. We recommend the prioritization of endovascular techniques on an individual basis in cases where accessible systems and surgeon familiarity provide an acceptable likelihood of rapid access and device deployment.
颅外颈动脉疾病血管内介入治疗的患者选择以血管解剖结构为核心。我们回顾了非创伤性疾病的解剖学考量因素,并提供患者选择和管理方面的指导原则。我们对涉及非创伤性疾病颅外颈动脉介入治疗解剖学考量因素的研究进行了系统的文献综述,但未进行荟萃分析。讨论的解剖学考量因素包括主动脉弓变异、血管狭窄程度、血管角度、迂曲度、异常起源,以及动脉粥样硬化斑块的形态、成分和位置。现有文献表明,发病的解剖学风险主要继发于手术时间延长以及介入系统输送困难。我们建议,在可使用的系统和术者熟悉程度能够提供快速进入和器械部署的可接受可能性的情况下,根据个体情况优先选择血管内技术。