Lv Shulan, Wang Qing, Li Yan, Zhao Lanbo, Wang Yiran, Feng Xue, Han Lu, Zhang Kailu, Yin Panyue, Hou Huilian, Shi Guizhi, Li Qiling
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yan'an People's Hospital, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China.
Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Oct 23;12:10551-10557. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S272755. eCollection 2020.
Cytopathology detecting for endometrial cancer is becoming accepted, and Tao Brush is the most widely used sampler for endometrial cells. This study aims to compare the effectiveness between Li brushes and Tao brushes for the diagnosis of endometrial lesions and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial cytology compared with histology.
There were 109 patients needing dilation and curettage (D&C) and 21 patients needing hysterectomies included from November 2017 to April 2018. Every patient was sampled by Tao brush and Li brush before D&C or hysterectomy performed. The cytological results were compared based on the gold standard histological results of D&C or hysterectomy.
The sensitivity of Li brush cytology for detecting endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia was estimated at 83.33%, specificity at 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) at 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) at 98.02%, respectively. While for the Tao brush, it was 91.67% of sensitivity, 96.04% of specificity, 73.33% of PPV, and 98.98% of NPV, respectively. The kappa value was 0.767, which indicated a substantial agreement. Cytology by both two brushes had a lower insufficient sample rate (2.75% of Tao brush, 4.59% of Li brush) than did D&C (11.93%).
Endometrial cytology is a reliable approach for evaluating endometrium with a lower insufficient sample rate. Cytology sampled by both Li brushes and Tao brushes has a high accuracy with histological diagnosis in detecting endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia. Combining social and economic benefits, the Li brush may be a better endometrial cell collector.
子宫内膜癌的细胞病理学检测正逐渐被接受,陶氏刷是子宫内膜细胞最常用的采样器。本研究旨在比较李氏刷和陶氏刷在诊断子宫内膜病变方面的有效性,并评估子宫内膜细胞学与组织学相比的诊断准确性。
纳入2017年11月至2018年4月期间需要刮宫术(D&C)的109例患者和需要子宫切除术的21例患者。在进行D&C或子宫切除术之前,每位患者均用陶氏刷和李氏刷进行采样。根据D&C或子宫切除术的金标准组织学结果比较细胞学结果。
李氏刷细胞学检测子宫内膜癌和非典型增生的敏感性估计分别为83.33%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值(PPV)为100%,阴性预测值(NPV)为98.02%。而对于陶氏刷,其敏感性为91.67%,特异性为96.04%,PPV为73.33%,NPV为 98.98%。kappa值为0.767,表明一致性良好。两种刷子的细胞学采样不足率(陶氏刷为2.75%,李氏刷为4.59%)均低于D&C(11.93%)。
子宫内膜细胞学是评估子宫内膜的可靠方法,采样不足率较低。李氏刷和陶氏刷采样的细胞学在检测子宫内膜癌和非典型增生方面与组织学诊断具有较高的准确性。综合社会和经济效益,李氏刷可能是更好的子宫内膜细胞采集器。