Sood Nilita, Wasilewski Nastasia V, Day Andrew G, Wall Taylar, Fisher Thomas, Fisher John T, Lougheed M Diane
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Front Physiol. 2020 Oct 6;11:554679. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.554679. eCollection 2020.
The pathophysiologic differences between methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) and healthy individuals (CONTROL) are incompletely understood and may be due to differences in the bronchodilating effect of deep inspirations (DIs). The purpose of this study is to compare the bronchodilating effect of DIs in individuals with classic asthma (CA), cough variant asthma (CVA), and COUGH with CONTROL and to assess impulse oscillometry (IOS) measures as predictors of the bronchodilating effect of DIs.
A total of 43 adults [18 female; 44.8 ± 12.3 years (mean ± SD); = 11 CA, = 10 CVA, = 7 COUGH, = 15 CONTROL] underwent modified high-dose methacholine challenge, with IOS and partial/maximal expiratory flow volume (PEFV/MEFV) maneuvers (used to calculate DI Index) to a maximum change (Δ) in FEV of 50% from baseline (MAX). Cough count and dyspnea were measured at each dose. The relation between IOS parameters and DI Index was assessed at baseline and MAX using multivariable linear regression analysis.
Cough frequency, dyspnea intensity, and baseline peripheral resistance (R5-R20) were significantly greater in COUGH compared with CONTROL ( = 0.006, = 0.029, and = 0.035, respectively). At MAX, the DI Index was significantly lower in COUGH (0.01 ± 0.36) compared with CA (0.67 ± 0.97, = 0.008), CVA (0.51 ± 0.73, = 0.012), and CONTROL (0.68 ± 0.45, = 0.005). Fres and R5-R20 were independent IOS predictors of the DI Index.
The bronchodilating effect is impaired in COUGH and preserved in mild CA, CVA, and CONTROL. Increased peripheral airway resistance and decreased resonant frequency are associated with a decreased DI Index. COUGH is a clinical phenotype distinct from healthy normals and asthma.
乙酰甲胆碱诱发咳嗽但气道敏感性正常(COUGH组)与健康个体(CONTROL组)之间的病理生理差异尚未完全明确,可能是由于深吸气(DI)的支气管舒张作用存在差异。本研究旨在比较经典哮喘(CA)、咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)以及COUGH组个体与CONTROL组个体中DI的支气管舒张作用,并评估脉冲振荡法(IOS)测量指标作为DI支气管舒张作用预测指标的价值。
共有43名成年人[18名女性;44.8±12.3岁(均值±标准差);CA组11例,CVA组10例,COUGH组7例,CONTROL组15例]接受改良高剂量乙酰甲胆碱激发试验,同时进行IOS以及部分/最大呼气流量容积(PEFV/MEFV)操作(用于计算DI指数),直至第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)较基线最大变化(Δ)达到50%(MAX)。在每个剂量下测量咳嗽次数和呼吸困难情况。使用多变量线性回归分析评估IOS参数与DI指数在基线和MAX时的关系。
与CONTROL组相比,COUGH组的咳嗽频率、呼吸困难强度以及基线外周阻力(R5 - R20)显著更高(分别为P = 0.006、P = 0.029和P = 0.035)。在MAX时,与CA组(0.67±0.97,P = 0.008)、CVA组(0.51±0.73,P = 0.012)和CONTROL组(0.68±0.45,P = 0.005)相比,COUGH组的DI指数显著更低(0.01±0.36)。Fres和R5 - R20是DI指数的独立IOS预测指标。
COUGH组的支气管舒张作用受损,而轻度CA组、CVA组和CONTROL组的支气管舒张作用得以保留。外周气道阻力增加和共振频率降低与DI指数降低相关。COUGH是一种与健康正常人和哮喘不同的临床表型。