Suppr超能文献

深吸气对咳嗽变异性哮喘的支气管保护作用:气道疾病谱中的一个显著特征?

Bronchoprotective effect of deep inspirations in cough variant asthma: A distinguishing feature in the spectrum of airway disease?

作者信息

Wasilewski Nastasia V, Fisher Thomas, Turcotte Scott E, Fisher John T, Lougheed M Diane

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Department of Medicine, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2018 Nov;257:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of deep inspirations (DIs) on airway behaviour in individuals with classic asthma (CA), cough variant asthma (CVA), and methacholine (MCh)-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity (COUGH) during bronchoprovocation.

METHODS

Twenty-five adults (18 female; 44.8 ± 12.3 years (Mean ± SD); n = 9 CA, n = 9 CVA, and n = 7 COUGH) completed two single-dose MCh challenges, with and without DIs. Bronchoprotection was assessed by comparing changes in bronchoconstriction (FEV, FVC, FEV/FVC, FEF, FEF), gas trapping (RV, RV/TLC) and impulse oscillometry (IOS) measurements.

RESULTS

The% changes in FEV with and without DIs were not significantly different within any group. Decreases in FEF and FEF were greater in CA (p = 0.041 and p = 0.029), decreases in FVC (% predicted) and FEV/FVC(%) were less in CVA (p = 0.048 and p = 0.010), and increases in RV (L) and RV/TLC (% predicted) were less in COUGH (p = 0.007 and p = 0.028), respectively. No differences in IOS measurements were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

DIs triggered bronchoconstriction in CA, bronchoprotection in CVA, and prevented gas trapping in COUGH.

摘要

目的

评估深吸气(DI)对经典哮喘(CA)、咳嗽变异性哮喘(CVA)以及在支气管激发试验中对乙酰甲胆碱(MCh)诱发咳嗽但气道敏感性正常(COUGH)个体的气道行为的影响。

方法

25名成年人(18名女性;平均年龄44.8±12.3岁(均值±标准差);9名CA患者、9名CVA患者和7名COUGH患者)完成了两次单剂量MCh激发试验,一次有DI,一次无DI。通过比较支气管收缩(FEV、FVC、FEV/FVC、FEF、FEF)、气体潴留(RV、RV/TLC)和脉冲振荡法(IOS)测量值的变化来评估支气管保护作用。

结果

在任何组内,有DI和无DI时FEV的变化百分比均无显著差异。CA组中FEF和FEF的下降幅度更大(p = 0.041和p = 0.029),CVA组中FVC(预测值百分比)和FEV/FVC(%)的下降幅度较小(p = 0.048和p = 0.010),COUGH组中RV(升)和RV/TLC(预测值百分比)的增加幅度较小(p = 0.007和p = 0.028)。IOS测量值无差异。

结论

深吸气在CA中引发支气管收缩,在CVA中起到支气管保护作用,并在COUGH中防止气体潴留。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验