• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Early results of the Resilia Inspiris aortic valve in the old age patients - a retrospective comparison with the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease.老年患者中Resilia Inspiris主动脉瓣的早期结果——与Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease的回顾性比较
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2020;12(3):222-226. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.38. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: a retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease.INSPIRIS RESILIA主动脉瓣的中期临床和超声心动图结果:与Magna Ease的回顾性比较。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul 19;37(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad117.
3
One-year clinical outcomes following Edwards INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve implantation in 487 young patients with severe aortic stenosis: a single-center experience.487例重度主动脉瓣狭窄年轻患者接受爱德华兹INSPIRIS RESILIA主动脉瓣植入术后的1年临床结局:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 3;10:1196447. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1196447. eCollection 2023.
4
Multicenter, propensity-weighted comparison of stented, rapid-deployment and new-generation aortic valves.多中心、倾向评分加权法比较带支架、快速释放及新一代主动脉瓣
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Aug 22;54:101487. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101487. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Device profile of the Inspiris Resilia valve for aortic valve replacement: overview of its safety and efficacy.Inspiris Resilia 主动脉瓣置换瓣膜器械特性:安全性和有效性概述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Mar;18(3):239-244. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1886921. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
6
Perimount MAGNA Ease vs. INSPIRIS Resilia Valve: A PS-Matched Analysis of the Hemodynamic Performances in Patients below 70 Years of Age.Perimount MAGNA Ease瓣膜与INSPIRIS Resilia瓣膜对比:70岁以下患者血流动力学性能的倾向评分匹配分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 6;12(5):2077. doi: 10.3390/jcm12052077.
7
Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.生物假体完全置于主动脉瓣环上方对小主动脉瓣环患者运动血流动力学的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 May;133(5):1234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.074.
8
Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.主动脉瓣置换术后的休息及运动血流动力学。19毫米和21毫米的伊奥内斯库-希利心包瓣膜与卡彭蒂埃-爱德华兹猪瓣膜的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Nov;90(5):750-5.
9
Durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves in patients under the age of 60 years - rationale and design of the international INDURE registry.60岁以下患者生物瓣主动脉瓣的耐久性——国际INDURE注册研究的原理与设计
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 May 27;15(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13019-020-01155-6.
10
The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?新型 St Jude Trifecta 与 Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna 和 Magna Ease 主动脉生物瓣比较:是否具有血液动力学优势?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 May;147(5):1553-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.05.045. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Individualized Selection of Valve Intervention Strategies in Aortic Disease Is Key for Better Outcomes.主动脉疾病中瓣膜干预策略的个体化选择是取得更好治疗效果的关键。
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 1;15(8):337. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080337.
2
Collagen-Based Products in Wound, Skin, and Health Care.用于伤口、皮肤及医疗保健的胶原蛋白类产品。
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1177/21621918251361118.
3
A fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model for patient-specific analysis of bioprosthetic aortic valve haemodynamics.用于生物人工主动脉瓣血流动力学患者特异性分析的全耦合流固相互作用模型。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 May 29;13:1584509. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1584509. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness of a Novel Bioprosthetic Valve for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Spain.西班牙一种新型生物人工心脏瓣膜用于外科主动脉瓣置换术的探索性成本效益分析
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00582-2.
5
Early and late clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement using the Inspiris Resilia bioprosthesis : A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用Inspiris Resilia生物假体进行主动脉瓣置换术的早期和晚期临床结果及成本效益:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Feb 5;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03269-7.
6
Multicenter, propensity-weighted comparison of stented, rapid-deployment and new-generation aortic valves.多中心、倾向评分加权法比较带支架、快速释放及新一代主动脉瓣
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Aug 22;54:101487. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101487. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
Performance and outcomes of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA transcatheter heart valve in the OCEAN-TAVI registry.OCEAN-TAVI 注册研究中 SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA 经导管心脏瓣膜的性能和结果。
EuroIntervention. 2024 May 10;20(9):579-590. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00996.
8
Mid-term clinical and echocardiographic results of the INSPIRIS RESILIA aortic valve: a retrospective comparison to the Magna Ease.INSPIRIS RESILIA主动脉瓣的中期临床和超声心动图结果:与Magna Ease的回顾性比较。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Jul 19;37(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad117.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary safety and effectiveness feasibility study after surgical aortic valve replacement with a new generation bioprosthesis: one-year outcomes.新一代生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术后的主要安全性和有效性可行性研究:一年结果。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(3):618-624. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0262. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
2
Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.机械瓣与生物瓣主动脉瓣置换术的比较。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jul 21;38(28):2183-2191. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx141.
3
Advanced Integrity Preservation Technology Reduces Bioprosthesis Calcification While Preserving Performance and Safety.先进的完整性保留技术可减少生物假体钙化,同时保持性能和安全性。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2015 Jan;24(1):101-9.
4
A randomized assessment of an advanced tissue preservation technology in the juvenile sheep model.一种先进的组织保存技术在幼年绵羊模型中的随机评估。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jan;149(1):340-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.062. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

老年患者中Resilia Inspiris主动脉瓣的早期结果——与Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease的回顾性比较

Early results of the Resilia Inspiris aortic valve in the old age patients - a retrospective comparison with the Carpentier Edwards Magna Ease.

作者信息

Shala Magjun, Niclauss Lars

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Biology, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Cardiovascular Department, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2020;12(3):222-226. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2020.38. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

DOI:10.34172/jcvtr.2020.38
PMID:33123329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7581840/
Abstract

The Inspiris Resilia aortic valve® (INSPIRIS) is a pericardial bio-prosthesis with a new sterilization procedure that shows promising results in terms of reduced calcification. The 30-day mortality and morbidity were analyzed, comparing the INSPIRIS implanted between May 2017 and the end of January 2019, with its "predecessor", the Carpentier-Edwards Perimound Magna Ease (ME). Echocardiography was performed one-week after surgery. 125consecutively operated patients were included (59 INSPIRIS, 66 ME). One patient in the ME group died and one patient in the INSPIRIS group had a complicated postoperative course due to right heart failure. Two patients (one INSPIRIS, one ME patient) suffered a perioperative stroke. The hemodynamic evaluation shows an effective reduction of mean transvalvular pressure gradients after surgery in both groups. INSPIRIS tended to have lower trans-prosthetic pressure gradients (9 mm Hg, Interquartile range [IQR] 11-7 mm Hg versus 12 mm Hg, IQR 15-9 mmHg; P = 0.001), reduced trans-prosthetic blood flow acceleration (209 cm/s, IQR 220-190 cm/s versus227 cm/s, IQR 263-191 cm/s; P = 0.003) and increased permeability indices (57%, IQR 67%- 47% versus42%, IQR 48%-38%; P8%; P < 0.001). There are only few clinical data available from INSPIRIS, and the present analysis confirms good results initial postoperatively with a tendency towards possibly improved hemodynamics compared to ME.

摘要

英斯派瑞斯瑞思丽主动脉瓣膜®(INSPIRIS)是一种心包生物假体,采用了新的灭菌程序,在减少钙化方面显示出有前景的结果。分析了2017年5月至2019年1月底植入INSPIRIS的患者与它的“前身”卡朋蒂埃 - 爱德华兹Perimound Magna Ease(ME)的30天死亡率和发病率。术后一周进行超声心动图检查。纳入了125例连续接受手术的患者(59例植入INSPIRIS,66例植入ME)。ME组有1例患者死亡,INSPIRIS组有1例患者因右心衰竭术后病程复杂。2例患者(1例INSPIRIS患者,1例ME患者)发生围手术期卒中。血流动力学评估显示两组术后平均跨瓣压差均有效降低。INSPIRIS的跨瓣压差往往更低(9 mmHg,四分位间距[IQR] 11 - 7 mmHg,而ME为12 mmHg,IQR 15 - 9 mmHg;P = 0.001),跨瓣血流加速降低(209 cm/s,IQR 220 - 190 cm/s,而ME为227 cm/s,IQR 263 - 191 cm/s;P = 0.003),通透性指数增加(57%,IQR 67% - 47%,而ME为42%,IQR 48% - 38%;P < 0.001)。关于INSPIRIS的临床数据很少,目前的分析证实术后初期结果良好,与ME相比有血流动力学可能改善的趋势。