Zhang Yuwei, Zhao Guofang, Ahmed Fatma Yislam Hadi, Yi Tianfei, Hu Shiyun, Cai Ting, Liao Qi
Hwa Mei Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Ningbo, China.
Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Pathophysiology, Department of Preventative Medicine, Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China.
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 2;10:584404. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.584404. eCollection 2020.
The CRISPR/Cas system has stood in the center of attention in the last few years as a revolutionary gene editing tool with a wide application to investigate gene functions. However, the labor-intensive workflow requires a sophisticated pre-experimental and post-experimental analysis, thus becoming one of the hindrances for the further popularization of practical applications. Recently, the increasing emergence and advancement of the methods play a formidable role to support and boost experimental work. However, various tools based on distinctive design principles and frameworks harbor unique characteristics that are likely to confuse users about how to choose the most appropriate one for their purpose. In this review, we will present a comprehensive overview and comparisons on the methods from the aspects of CRISPR/Cas system identification, guide RNA design, and post-experimental assistance. Furthermore, we establish the hypotheses in light of the new trends around the technical optimization and hope to provide significant clues for future tools development.
近年来,CRISPR/Cas系统作为一种具有广泛应用前景的革命性基因编辑工具,一直备受关注,可用于研究基因功能。然而,这种劳动密集型的工作流程需要复杂的实验前和实验后分析,因此成为实际应用进一步推广的障碍之一。最近,这些方法的不断涌现和发展对支持和推动实验工作发挥了重要作用。然而,基于不同设计原则和框架的各种工具具有独特的特性,这可能会让用户在如何为自己的目的选择最合适的工具方面感到困惑。在这篇综述中,我们将从CRISPR/Cas系统识别、导向RNA设计和实验后辅助等方面对这些方法进行全面概述和比较。此外,我们根据技术优化的新趋势提出假设,希望为未来工具的开发提供重要线索。