Division of Plastic Surgery, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, 2350, Ramiro Barcelos st, Porto Alegre-RS, 90035-007, Brazil.
Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul Medical School, Porto Alegre-RS, Brazil.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Apr;45(2):521-527. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01972-z. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Up to 25% of otoplasties can lead to complications, indicating the need for technical refinement. Stenström's anterior auricular cartilage scoring is used in combination with Mustardé's technique to treat the antihelix deformity in several series, with good results. Both can be performed with different instruments such as rasps or puncture needles.
This study aims to compare the use of puncture needles and rasps for anterior cartilage scoring in otoplasty. The association of Stenström and Mustardé were the basic technique. Anatomical and aesthetic endpoints were assessed. We also reviewed postoperative complications.
Forty-two patients with prominent ears and no previous surgery were randomly assigned needle or rasps technique. They were operated on by the first-year plastic surgery resident in the years of 2014 and 2019. The patients were followed up and reviewed at days 2 and 15, as well as 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The endpoints were evaluated through pre- and postoperative photographs by four experienced plastic surgeons unaware of the techniques used in each case. Patient satisfaction was searched by a "yes" or "no" question. Surgical time and postoperative edema were evaluated in 20 patients (2014 group).
There were no statistical differences between the groups in terms of overall results, symmetry, antihelix shape or cartilage fracture. Ninety-five percent of the patients were satisfied with the outcome. The needle technique resulted in less postoperative edema and shorter surgical time.
Anterior cartilage scoring used in combination with posterior mattress sutures to treat poorly formed antihelical fold has good and similar results when performed with rasps or puncture needles, even in unexperienced hands. The needle has the advantage of leading to a comparable surgical time and less postoperative edema, while not requiring any special surgical instrument.
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the table of contents or the online instructions to authors www.springer.com/00266 .
多达 25%的耳成形术可能会导致并发症,这表明需要技术上的改进。Stenström 的耳前软骨划线术与 Mustardé 技术联合用于治疗多个系列的反耳轮畸形,效果良好。两者都可以使用不同的器械,如骨锉或穿刺针来完成。
本研究旨在比较穿刺针和骨锉在前耳软骨划线术中的应用。Stenström 和 Mustardé 的联合是基本技术。评估解剖学和美学终点,并回顾术后并发症。
42 例有突出耳且无既往手术史的患者被随机分配使用针或锉技术。这些患者由 2014 年和 2019 年的第一年整形住院医师进行手术。在术后第 2 天和第 15 天以及术后 1、3 和 6 个月对患者进行随访和评估。通过四位经验丰富的整形外科医生对术前和术后照片进行评估,这些医生不知道每个病例中使用的技术。通过“是”或“否”问题来调查患者的满意度。对 20 名患者(2014 组)进行了手术时间和术后水肿的评估。
在总体结果、对称性、反耳轮形状或软骨骨折方面,两组之间无统计学差异。95%的患者对结果满意。针技术导致术后水肿程度较轻,手术时间较短。
在前耳软骨划线术联合后床垫缝线治疗形态不良的反耳轮折叠中,使用骨锉或穿刺针效果良好且相似,即使在经验不足的情况下也是如此。针的优点是可以达到类似的手术时间和较少的术后水肿,而不需要任何特殊的手术器械。
证据等级 IV:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据等级。有关这些基于证据的医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线向作者说明 www.springer.com/00266 。