Department of Burns, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong, China.
Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Tai'an, Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an, Shandong, China.
Int Wound J. 2021 Feb;18(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13518. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effects of artificial dermis combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) compared with autologous intermediate-thickness skin grafting (ITSG) alone in severely burned patients. Fifty-six severely burned patients admitted to our hospital from December 2017 to January 2019 were enrolled and evenly grouped according to the random number table method [AD-STSG group: 28 patients, receiving the treatment of artificial dermis (AD) combined with autologous STSG; ITSG group: 28 patients, receiving autologous ITSG treatment alone]. The healing time and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) score of the donor area and graft area, survival rate and infection status of the autologous skin, psychological status (determined by Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Self-rating Depression Scale), and the activity of functional parts of all enrolled patients were included in the evaluation. General items of patients in AD-STSG group and ITSG group, including age, sex, and degree of burn, were all comparable. A significantly shortened healing time of donor skin in AD-STSG group was observed when compared with ITSG group (P < .05) while the recipient skin healed in the same tendency between the two groups. In addition, 21 days after the operation, AD-STSG group presented with significantly higher survival rate of graft skin than ITSG group (P < .05) while same infection status was observed in the two groups. Significantly lower VSS scores were found in AD-STSG group than that in ITSG group 3-, 6- and 10-months after operation (P < .05). Statistical difference regarding psychological status of patients from two groups was unobservable before operation while significantly lower Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores were found in AD-STSG group than that in ITSG group 3-, 6- and 10-months after operation (P < .05). Also, AD-STSG group presented improved mobility of functional part than that in ITSG group 10-months after operation without statistical difference (P = .051). Artificial dermis combined with autologous split-thickness skin grafting showed better therapeutic outcomes for the treatment of severely burned patients than autologous intermediate-thickness skin grafting in terms of graft healing time, scar formation, psychological recovery, and perhaps in functional reconstruction.
本研究旨在评估人工真皮联合自体刃厚皮片移植(STSG)与单纯自体中厚皮片移植(ITSG)治疗严重烧伤患者的疗效。2017 年 12 月至 2019 年 1 月,我院收治的 56 例严重烧伤患者按随机数字表法分为两组[AD-STSG 组:28 例,采用人工真皮(AD)联合自体 STSG 治疗;ITSG 组:28 例,采用单纯自体 ITSG 治疗]。评估两组患者供皮区及植皮区愈合时间、温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)评分、自体皮成活率及感染情况、所有患者心理状态(采用焦虑自评量表和抑郁自评量表评定)及功能部位活动度。AD-STSG 组和 ITSG 组患者的一般项目,包括年龄、性别和烧伤程度,均具有可比性。AD-STSG 组供皮区愈合时间明显短于 ITSG 组(P<0.05),而两组患者受皮区愈合情况相同。此外,术后 21d,AD-STSG 组患者植皮成活率明显高于 ITSG 组(P<0.05),两组患者感染情况相同。术后 3、6、10 个月,AD-STSG 组患者 VSS 评分明显低于 ITSG 组(P<0.05)。两组患者术前心理状态无统计学差异,AD-STSG 组术后 3、6、10 个月的焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分明显低于 ITSG 组(P<0.05)。术后 10 个月,AD-STSG 组患者功能部位活动度改善优于 ITSG 组,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.051)。人工真皮联合自体 STSG 治疗严重烧伤患者的疗效优于单纯自体 ITSG,在植皮愈合时间、瘢痕形成、心理恢复等方面可能在功能重建方面更好。