Liu Jing-Si, Zhu Xiao-Sheng, Hu Zi-Long, Zhang Si-Si, Yang Zheng-Jian, Ji Dao-Bin, Liu De-Fu
College of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration of River-lake and Algal Utilization, School of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environment, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Aug 8;41(8):3601-3611. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201912135.
To determine the reasons for the variation in the vertical distribution of nitrogen in sediment interstitial waters between different stratified reservoirs, the characteristics of overlying water-interstitial water in Xiangxi Bay, Yangtze River mainstream, and Xiaowan Reservoir were monitored. The vertical distribution of nitrogen in sediment interstitial waters in these different stratified waters were then analyzed, and the reasons for the variation in this distribution were assessed. The results showed:① the (TN) in the sediment interstitial waters of the Yangtze River mainstream and Xiangxi Bay gradually increased with depth, while that of Xiaowan Reservoir reached its maximum at 12 cm and the bottom layer presented a "C" distribution. The (NH) in the sediment interstitial waters of the Yangtze River mainstream and Xiangxi Bay exhibited an increasing trend with depth, while that of Xiaowan Reservoir was slightly higher in the bottom layer than in the surface layer, although the change with depth was not significant. Overall, the (NH) in the sediment interstitial waters of the Yangtze River mainstream and Xiangxi Bay was higher than that of Xiaowan Reservoir, and the concentration ranges were as follows:0.512-8.289 mg·L, 0.968-9.307 mg·L, and 0.950-1.450 mg·L. The vertical distribution of the (NO) in the sediment interstitial waters of all three waterbodies were opposite to that of (NH). Moreover, the (NO) in the sediment interstitial waters of Xiangxi Bay and the Yangtze River mainstream was higher than that of Xiaowan Reservoir. The concentration ranges were as follows:0.143-0.674 mg·L, 0.107-0.647 mg·L, and 0.050-0.051 mg·L. ② There were also significant differences in the vertical distribution of physical and chemical indices in the three water bodies. There was no significant change in the vertical distribution of the water temperature in the Yangtze River mainstream and the value was <5×10 s; hence, the water was well mixed, and the vertical range of the dissolved oxygen content was 6.180-6.318 mg·L. The water temperature in the upper and middle reaches of Xiangxi Bay decreased vertically, while the water temperature in the lower reach presented a ladder-like distribution and the values were all>5×10 s; thus, the water was in a stable stratified state and the dissolved oxygen content presented a "C" distribution. There was obvious stratification at the depths of 5-15 m and 54-70 m in Xiaowan Reservoir. The dissolved oxygen content decreased significantly at higher water temperature gradients, and there was no significant change along the water depth below 80 m. ③ The main reasons for the variation in the vertical distribution of nitrogen in the sediment interstitial waters of the three waterbodies were the differences in the overlying water hydrodynamics, dissolved oxygen distribution, and sediment environment. The (NH) and (NO) were higher in Xiangxi Bay, which may have increased the denitrification rate and subsequently have helped to remove nitrogen and reduce the nitrogen load in these waters.
为确定不同分层水库沉积物间隙水中氮垂直分布差异的原因,对长江干流、香溪河库湾和小湾水库的上覆水-间隙水特征进行了监测。随后分析了这些不同分层水体中沉积物间隙水中氮的垂直分布情况,并评估了该分布变化的原因。结果表明:①长江干流和香溪河库湾沉积物间隙水中的总氮(TN)随深度逐渐增加,而小湾水库的总氮在12 cm处达到最大值,底层呈现“C”型分布。长江干流和香溪河库湾沉积物间隙水中的铵态氮(NH)随深度呈增加趋势,小湾水库底层的铵态氮略高于表层,尽管随深度变化不显著。总体而言,长江干流和香溪河库湾沉积物间隙水中的铵态氮高于小湾水库,其浓度范围分别为:0.512 - 8.289 mg·L、0.968 - 9.307 mg·L和0.950 - 1.450 mg·L。三个水体沉积物间隙水中的硝态氮(NO)垂直分布与铵态氮相反。此外,香溪河库湾和长江干流沉积物间隙水中的硝态氮高于小湾水库。其浓度范围分别为:0.143 - 0.674 mg·L、0.107 - 0.647 mg·L和0.050 - 0.051 mg·L。②三个水体的物理化学指标垂直分布也存在显著差异。长江干流水温垂直分布无显著变化,且 值<5×10 s;因此,水体混合良好,溶解氧含量的垂直范围为6.180 - 6.318 mg·L。香溪河库湾中上游水温垂直降低,下游水温呈阶梯状分布,且 值均>5×10 s;因此,水体处于稳定分层状态,溶解氧含量呈现“C”型分布。小湾水库在5 - 15 m和54 - 70 m深度处有明显分层。在较高水温梯度下,溶解氧含量显著降低,80 m以下水深沿水深无显著变化。③三个水体沉积物间隙水中氮垂直分布变化的主要原因是上覆水动力、溶解氧分布和沉积物环境的差异。香溪河库湾中的铵态氮和硝态氮较高,这可能提高了反硝化速率,进而有助于去除氮并降低这些水体中的氮负荷。