du Toit Maria N, van der Linde Jeannie, Swanepoel De Wet
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 56410University of Pretoria, South Africa.
J Child Health Care. 2021 Dec;25(4):573-586. doi: 10.1177/1367493520970012. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
Children are often only identified with a developmental delay when they enter primary school due to developmental delays hindering academic progress. Detection of at-risk children in low-income communities is typically unavailable due to several challenges. This study validated an mHealth-based developmental screening tool as a potential time- and cost-effective way of delivering services for preschool children. This cross-sectional within-subject study screened 276 preschool children from low-income communities using the mHealth Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) tools. The mHealth PEDS tools' performance was then evaluated by comparing caregiver concerns according to the PEDS tools with results obtained using a reference standard assessment tool, the Vineland-3. The mHealth PEDS tools identified 237 (85.9%) of children at risk of developmental delay compared to 80.1% ( = 221) of children identified with a developmental delay using the Vineland-3. Sensitivity of the PEDS tools was high (92.6%) with low specificity (22.5%) using US standardised criteria. Literacy skills were found to be most delayed, according to the PEDS: DM (89.3%; = 142) and Vineland-3 (87.1%; = 134). Low specificity of the prescribed criteria may require the implementation of adapted referral criteria within low socio-economic status (SES) settings. The mHealth PEDS tools may still be valuable for preschool developmental surveillance of children within low SES settings. It is recommended, however, that children who are identified with a developmental concern undergo a second screen to reduce false positives.
由于发育迟缓阻碍学业进展,儿童往往直到进入小学才被确定存在发育迟缓问题。由于面临诸多挑战,低收入社区中处于风险的儿童通常无法被检测出来。本研究验证了一种基于移动健康的发育筛查工具,作为一种为学龄前儿童提供服务的潜在的节省时间和成本的方式。这项横断面受试者内研究使用移动健康版父母发育状况评估(PEDS)工具对276名来自低收入社区的学龄前儿童进行了筛查。然后,通过将根据PEDS工具得出的照顾者担忧情况与使用参考标准评估工具韦氏儿童智力量表第三版(Vineland-3)获得的结果进行比较,来评估移动健康版PEDS工具的性能。与使用Vineland-3确定为发育迟缓的儿童比例80.1%(n = 221)相比,移动健康版PEDS工具识别出237名(85.9%)有发育迟缓风险的儿童。根据美国标准化标准,PEDS工具的敏感性较高(92.6%),但特异性较低(22.5%)。根据PEDS工具,读写技能被发现是延迟最严重的:DM(89.3%;n = 142)和Vineland-3(87.1%;n = 134)。规定标准的低特异性可能需要在低社会经济地位(SES)环境中实施适应性的转诊标准。移动健康版PEDS工具对于低SES环境中儿童的学龄前发育监测可能仍然有价值。然而,建议对被确定存在发育问题的儿童进行二次筛查,以减少假阳性。