• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用锥形束 CT 测量的每日摆位变化对行三维适形放疗早期乳腺癌患者俯卧位治疗的剂量学影响研究。

A study of the dosimetric impact of daily setup variations measured with cone-beam CT on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer delivered in the prone position.

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Dec;21(12):146-154. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13080. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1002/acm2.13080
PMID:33124774
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7769386/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the dosimetric impact of daily positioning variations measured with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) on whole-breast radiotherapy patients treated in the prone position.

METHODS

Daily CBCT was prospectively acquired for 30 consecutive patients positioned prone. Treatment for early-stage (≤II) breast cancer was prescribed with standard dose (50 Gy/25 fractions) or hypofractionation (42.56 Gy/16 fractions) for 13 and 17 patients, respectively. Systematic and random errors were calculated from the translational CBCT shifts and used to determine population-based setup margins. Mean translations (±one standard deviation) for each patient were used to simulate the dosimetric impact on targets (PTV_eval and lumpectomy cavity), heart, and lung. Paired Student's t tests at α = 0.01 were used to compare dose metrics after correction for multiple testing (P < 0.002). Significant correlation coefficients were used to identify associations (P < 0.01).

RESULTS

Of 597 total fractions, 20 ± 13% required patient rotation. Mean translations were 0.29 ± 0.27 cm, 0.41 ± 0.34 cm, and 0.48 ± 0.33 cm in the anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and lateral directions leading to calculated setup margins of 0.63, 0.88, and 1.10 cm, respectively. Average three-dimensional (3D) shifts correlated with the maximum distance of breast tissue from the sternum (r = 0.62) but not with body-mass index. Simulated shifts showed significant, but minor, changes in dose metrics for PTV_eval, lung, and heart. For left-sided treatments (n = 18), mean heart dose increased from 109 ± 75 cGy to 148 ± 115 cGy. Shifts from the original plan caused PTV_eval hotspots (V105%) to increase by 5.2% ± 3.8%, which correlated with the total MU of wedged fields (r = 0.59). No significant change in V95% to the cavity was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Large translational variations that occur when positioning prone breast patients had small but significant dosimetric effects on 3DCRT plans. Daily CBCT may still be necessary to correct for rotational variations that occur in 20% of treatments. To maintain planned dose metrics, unintended beam shifts toward the heart and the contribution of wedged fields should be minimized.

摘要

目的

评估使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量的日常定位变化对接受俯卧位全乳房放疗的患者的剂量学影响。

方法

前瞻性地对 30 例连续俯卧位患者进行每日 CBCT 采集。为 13 例早期(≤II 期)乳腺癌患者和 17 例接受标准剂量(50Gy/25 次)或低分割(42.56Gy/16 次)治疗的患者分别处方治疗。从平移 CBCT 移位中计算系统误差和随机误差,并用于确定基于人群的设置边界。每位患者的平均平移(±一个标准差)用于模拟对靶区(PTV_eval 和乳房切除术腔)、心脏和肺的剂量学影响。使用配对学生 t 检验(α=0.01),对多次检验(P<0.002)进行校正后比较剂量指标。使用显著相关系数(P<0.01)来识别相关性。

结果

在 597 个总分次中,有 20%±13%需要患者旋转。平均平移为 0.29±0.27cm、0.41±0.34cm 和 0.48±0.33cm,在前-后、上-下和侧-方向上分别导致 0.63、0.88 和 1.10cm 的设置边界。平均三维(3D)移位与乳房组织距胸骨的最大距离相关(r=0.62),但与体重指数无关。模拟移位导致 PTV_eval、肺和心脏的剂量指标发生显著但较小的变化。对于左侧治疗(n=18),平均心脏剂量从 109±75cGy 增加到 148±115cGy。原始计划中的移位导致 PTV_eval 热点(V105%)增加了 5.2%±3.8%,与楔形野的总 MU 相关(r=0.59)。未发现对腔的 V95%有显著变化。

结论

当俯卧位定位患者时,发生的大的平移变化对 3DCRT 计划有微小但显著的剂量学影响。为了纠正 20%治疗中发生的旋转变化,可能仍需要每日进行 CBCT。为了维持计划剂量指标,应尽量减少射束向心脏的意外移位和楔形野的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/fed664bddeb4/ACM2-21-146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/0e0b9a82c9eb/ACM2-21-146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/ccc07c12c5bd/ACM2-21-146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/fed664bddeb4/ACM2-21-146-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/0e0b9a82c9eb/ACM2-21-146-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/ccc07c12c5bd/ACM2-21-146-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09ad/7769386/fed664bddeb4/ACM2-21-146-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A study of the dosimetric impact of daily setup variations measured with cone-beam CT on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer delivered in the prone position.采用锥形束 CT 测量的每日摆位变化对行三维适形放疗早期乳腺癌患者俯卧位治疗的剂量学影响研究。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Dec;21(12):146-154. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13080. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
2
Per-fraction positional and dosimetric performance of prone breast tangential radiotherapy on Halcyon™ linear accelerator assessed with daily rapid kilo-voltage cone beam computed tomography: a single-institution pilot study.每日快速千伏锥形束计算机断层扫描评估 Halcyon™直线加速器俯卧位乳腺癌切线放疗的分次内位置和剂量学性能:单机构试点研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Nov 7;15(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01700-6.
3
Prospective study of cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for prone accelerated partial breast irradiation.前瞻性研究锥形束计算机断层扫描图像引导放疗在俯卧位加速部分乳腺照射中的应用。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Oct 1;81(2):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 May 11.
4
Interfractional variation in whole-breast VMAT irradiation: a dosimetric study with complementary SGRT and CBCT patient setup.分次间全乳 VMAT 照射的变化:使用互补的 SGRT 和 CBCT 患者摆位的剂量学研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Feb 13;19(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02418-5.
5
An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.一项关于接受逆向计划调强放射治疗的乳腺癌术后患者摆位重复性的图像引导研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
6
Does the protocol-required uniform margin around the CTV adequately account for setup inaccuracies in whole breast irradiation?在全乳照射中,CTV 周围所需的规则边界能否充分考虑到摆位误差?
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Aug 3;16(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01863-w.
7
Dosimetric influences of rotational setup errors on head and neck carcinoma intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments.旋转摆位误差对头颈部癌调强放射治疗剂量学的影响。
Med Dosim. 2013 Summer;38(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
8
[Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].[乳腺癌调强切线野照射与传统切线野照射的剂量学评估]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Jul;25(7):855-60.
9
The Effect of Lumpectomy Cavity Changes on Planning Dose in Breast Radiotherapy Boost.保乳手术腔隙变化对乳腺癌放疗加量计划剂量的影响。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2019 Jun;50(2):317-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
10
Setup uncertainties and the optimal imaging schedule in the prone position whole breast radiotherapy.俯卧位全乳放疗中的摆位不确定性和最佳成像时间安排。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 9;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1282-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Studies of the Impact of Rotational Errors on Translation Shifts and Dose Distribution in Image-Guided Radiotherapy.旋转误差对图像引导放射治疗中平移误差和剂量分布影响的研究。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15330338231168763. doi: 10.1177/15330338231168763.
2
Dosimetric variation in preoperative partial breast radiosurgery assessed by deformable image registrations.通过可变形图像配准评估术前部分乳腺放射外科手术中的剂量学变化。
J Radiosurg SBRT. 2022;8(3):227-235.

本文引用的文献

1
Setup uncertainties and the optimal imaging schedule in the prone position whole breast radiotherapy.俯卧位全乳放疗中的摆位不确定性和最佳成像时间安排。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 May 9;14(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1282-4.
2
Dosimetric effects of the kV based image-guided radiation therapy of prone breast external beam radiation: Towards the optimized imaging frequency.基于千伏级图像引导的俯卧位乳腺外照射放疗的剂量学效应:迈向优化成像频率
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jan;20(1):212-219. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12511. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
3
Radiation therapy for the whole breast: Executive summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) evidence-based guideline.
全乳放射治疗:美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)基于证据的指南执行摘要。
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May-Jun;8(3):145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
4
Evaluation of RayStation robust optimisation for superficial target coverage with setup variation in breast IMRT.评估RayStation在乳腺调强放疗中针对摆位误差的浅表靶区覆盖的稳健优化。
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2016 Sep;39(3):705-16. doi: 10.1007/s13246-016-0466-6. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
5
Feasibility evaluation of prone breast irradiation with the Sagittilt system including residual-intrafractional error assessment.使用Sagittilt系统进行俯卧位乳腺照射的可行性评估,包括分次内残余误差评估。
Cancer Radiother. 2016 Dec;20(8):776-782. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2016.05.014. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Breast-conserving Surgery Rates in Breast Cancer Patients With Different Molecular Subtypes: An Observational Study Based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.不同分子亚型乳腺癌患者的保乳手术率:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的观察性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(8):e2593. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002593.
7
Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation.俯卧位和仰卧位全乳照射的摆位精度。
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Apr;192(4):254-9. doi: 10.1007/s00066-016-0943-6. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
The Role of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer Responding to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.乳房切除术后放射治疗在对新辅助化疗有反应的乳腺癌患者中的作用。
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan;26(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
9
Efficacy and workload analysis of a fixed vertical couch position technique and a fixed-action-level protocol in whole-breast radiotherapy.全乳放疗中固定垂直治疗床位置技术和固定行动水平方案的疗效及工作量分析
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):5265. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5265.
10
An image-guided study of setup reproducibility of postmastectomy breast cancer patients treated with inverse-planned intensity modulated radiation therapy.一项关于接受逆向计划调强放射治疗的乳腺癌术后患者摆位重复性的图像引导研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jan 1;91(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Oct 22.