Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Cortex. 2020 Dec;133:149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
In visual search, salient yet task-irrelevant distractors in the stimulus array interfere with target selection. This is due to the unwanted shift of attention towards the salient stimulus-the so-called attentional capture effect, which delays deployment of attention onto the target. Although powerful and automatic, attentional capture by a salient distractor is nonetheless antagonized by distractor-filtering mechanisms and is further modulated by cross-trial contingencies: The distractor cost is typically more robust when no distraction has been experienced in the immediate past, compared to when a distractor was present on the immediately preceding trial. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to shed light on the causal role of two crucial nodes of the ventral attention network, namely the Temporo-Parietal Junction (TPJ) and the Middle Frontal Gyrus (MFG), in the exogenous control of attention (i.e., attentional capture) and its history-dependent modulation. Participants were asked to discriminate the direction of a target arrow while ignoring a task-irrelevant salient distractor, when present. Immediately after display onset, 10 Hz triple-pulse TMS was delivered either to TPJ or MFG on the right hemisphere. Results demonstrated that stimulation of right TPJ-but not of right MFG, strongly modulated attentional capture as a function of the type of previous trial, by somewhat enhancing the distractor-related cost when the preceding trial was a distractor-absent trial and significantly decreasing the cost when the preceding trial was a distractor-present trial. These findings indicate that TMS of right TPJ exacerbates the effect of the recent history, likely reflecting enhanced updating of the predictive model that dynamically governs proactive distractor-filtering mechanisms. More generally, the results attest to a role of TPJ in mediating the history-dependent modulation of attentional capture.
在视觉搜索中,刺激数组中突出但与任务无关的分心物会干扰目标选择。这是由于注意力不可避免地转移到突出的刺激上,即所谓的注意力捕获效应,这会延迟注意力投向目标。尽管注意力捕获是强大且自动的,但它仍然受到分心物过滤机制的拮抗作用的影响,并受到跨试验偶然性的进一步调节:当最近没有经历分心时,分心成本通常更为稳健,与在前一个试验中存在分心物相比。在这里,我们使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)来阐明腹侧注意网络的两个关键节点(即颞顶联合区(TPJ)和中额回(MFG))在注意力的外源性控制(即注意力捕获)及其历史依赖性调节中的因果作用。要求参与者在忽略任务无关的突出分心物的情况下,当目标箭头出现时,辨别其方向。在显示开始后立即,在右半球的 TPJ 或 MFG 上给予 10 Hz 三脉冲 TMS。结果表明,右侧 TPJ 的刺激-而不是右侧 MFG 的刺激-强烈地调节了注意力捕获,这取决于前一个试验的类型,当前一个试验是无分心物试验时,略微增加了与分心物相关的成本,而当前一个试验是有分心物试验时,显著降低了成本。这些发现表明,右侧 TPJ 的 TMS 加剧了最近历史的影响,这可能反映了对动态控制主动分心物过滤机制的预测模型的更新增强。更一般地说,这些结果证明了 TPJ 在介导注意力捕获的历史依赖性调节中的作用。