5 年回顾性评价正畸治疗患者的直接复合树脂修复体。

5-year retrospective evaluation of direct composite restorations in orthodontically treated patients.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Surgical Sciences, Dental School, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.

出版信息

J Dent. 2021 Jan;104:103510. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103510. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In patients affected by dimensional discrepancy between size of anterior maxillary and mandibular teeth, orthodontic therapy could be necessary to solve occlusal problems. However, anterior restorations are indicated to finalize the aesthetic aspect of the therapy. The aim of the present retrospective clinical study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of direct additive composite restorations performed to correct anterior teeth discrepancies persisting after orthodontic treatment.

METHODS

Patients with dimensional teeth discrepancy, subjected to a combined orthodontic-restorative treatment, between January 2009 and January 2019, were recalled for the present retrospective evaluation and divided in two groups according to the restoration performed: G1) diastema closure; G2) tooth shape modification. All patients, after ortho therapy, were subjected to a standardized restorative rehabilitation of the anterior area. All restorations were performed by a single experienced operator employing the same materials. During recall visits, two calibrated examiners evaluated the restorations and recorded USPHS data. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox-regression analysis were performed. Statistical significance was set for p < 0.05.

RESULTS

53 patient were included, with a total of 169 restoration (G1:110;G2:59). The mean study time period was 5 year (ranging from 6 month to 10 years). The overall survival rate of additive restoration was 2,59% (G1:2,07%; G2:0,47 p < 0.05). Chipping of the material was the most frequent adverse event (G1:13,64%; G2:1,69), followed by composite wear (G1:9,09%; G2:5,17).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the obtained results, good clinical performances were shown at a 5-year interval. A low number of failures were collected and most of them were classified as reparable. Only few cases needed complete reintervention.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Showing that a direct approach in restoring anterior teeth for diastema closure or shape modification is a valid alternative in terms of durability and aesthetics to more invasive procedure such as indirect restorations.

摘要

目的

在前后牙大小存在尺寸差异的患者中,可能需要进行正畸治疗以解决咬合问题。然而,前牙修复是完成治疗美学效果的必要手段。本回顾性临床研究的目的是评估直接复合树脂修复治疗正畸后持续存在的前牙间隙过大的长期效果。

方法

选择 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月间因牙列间隙过大接受正畸-修复联合治疗的患者进行回顾性评估,并根据修复方法将患者分为两组:G1 组为关闭间隙,G2 组为改善牙体形态。所有患者正畸治疗后,均采用标准化的前牙修复方法。所有修复均由一位经验丰富的医生使用相同的材料进行。在随访时,由两位经过校准的检查者评估修复体并记录 USPHS 数据。采用 Kaplan-Meier 估计和 Cox 回归分析。设定 p<0.05 为统计学意义。

结果

共纳入 53 例患者,总计 169 个修复体(G1 组:110 个;G2 组:59 个)。平均研究时间为 5 年(6 个月至 10 年)。复合树脂修复体的总存活率为 2.59%(G1 组:2.07%;G2 组:0.47%,p<0.05)。材料碎裂是最常见的不良事件(G1 组:13.64%;G2 组:1.69%),其次是复合树脂磨损(G1 组:9.09%;G2 组:5.17%)。

结论

基于获得的结果,在 5 年的随访期间,该方法显示出良好的临床效果。收集到的失败病例数量较少,且多数为可修复的。仅少数病例需要完全再次干预。

临床意义

表明直接修复前牙间隙过大或改善牙体形态是一种替代间接修复的更具侵袭性方法的有效方法,在耐用性和美学方面都具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索