• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绘画欣赏过程中皮质脊髓兴奋性的调制:一项 TMS 研究。

Modulation of corticospinal excitability during paintings viewing: A TMS study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Department of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2020 Dec;149:107664. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107664. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107664
PMID:33130160
Abstract

It has been hypothesized that embodied mechanisms encompassing the simulation of actions, emotions and corporeal sensations contribute to aesthetic appreciation of art. In line with this, in this study we assessed whether there is a relationship between the extent to which an artwork triggers motor resonance mechanisms and liking for the artwork. To this aim, we measured motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by TMS over M1 whilst participants viewed a series of paintings depicting either humans in static postures or performing dynamic actions, and paintings depicting static or dynamic non-human scenes. Following recording of MEPs, participants indicated how much they liked each painting and found the painting to be dynamic. Viewing of paintings depicting dynamic human actions was associated with a significant increase in MEPs size compared to baseline and to viewing of the other paintings. The more the painting conveyed the impression of a dynamic human action, the higher the MEPs amplitude and the more the artwork was liked. However, liking per se was not related to MEPs size. In fact, the positive relationship between MEPs size and preference for paintings depicting humans was entirely mediated by the perceived dynamism of the portrayed actions, and no positive relationship was observed between subjective preference for paintings depicting landscapes/objects and MEPs size. Overall, our data contribute to shed light on the possible role of embodied resonance mechanisms in aesthetic appreciation of visual art, and show that characterization of motor cortical excitability may serve as a promising approach in neuroaesthetics.

摘要

有人假设,包含动作、情感和身体感觉模拟的体现机制有助于对艺术的审美欣赏。根据这一点,在这项研究中,我们评估了艺术品引发运动共鸣机制的程度与对艺术品的喜爱之间是否存在关系。为此,我们测量了参与者观看一系列描绘静态姿势或动态动作的人类、静态或动态非人类场景的画作时,经 TMS 刺激 M1 引起的运动诱发电位(MEPs)。记录 MEPs 后,参与者表示他们喜欢每幅画的程度,并发现该画具有动态感。与基线相比,观看描绘动态人类动作的画作会导致 MEPs 幅度显著增加,与观看其他画作相比也是如此。画作传达出动态人类动作的印象越强烈,MEPs 的幅度就越高,对艺术品的喜爱程度也就越高。然而,单纯的喜好本身与 MEPs 的幅度无关。事实上,MEPs 幅度与喜欢描绘人类的画作之间的正相关关系完全是由所描绘动作的动态印象介导的,而对描绘风景/物体的画作的主观偏好与 MEPs 幅度之间没有正相关关系。总的来说,我们的数据有助于阐明体现共鸣机制在视觉艺术审美欣赏中的可能作用,并表明运动皮质兴奋性的特征可能是神经美学中的一种有前途的方法。

相似文献

1
Modulation of corticospinal excitability during paintings viewing: A TMS study.绘画欣赏过程中皮质脊髓兴奋性的调制:一项 TMS 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Dec;149:107664. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107664. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
2
A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation.一项关于视觉区域V5对艺术中隐含运动感知及其欣赏贡献的经颅磁刺激研究。
Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jan;8(1):59-68. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1083968. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
3
The role of the lateral occipital cortex in aesthetic appreciation of representational and abstract paintings: a TMS study.枕外侧皮质在具象画和抽象画审美欣赏中的作用:一项经颅磁刺激研究
Brain Cogn. 2015 Apr;95:44-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
4
Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks.分离艺术作品运动反应中的具身性和情绪反应性。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104663. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
5
Movement in Aesthetic Experiences: What We Can Learn from Parkinson Disease.美感体验中的运动:我们能从帕金森病中学到什么。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jun 1;33(7):1329-1342. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01718.
6
TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits.经颞上沟的 TMS 会影响对人像的表现力评价。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Dec;18(6):1188-1197. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0630-4.
7
Neural correlates of visual aesthetic appreciation: insights from non-invasive brain stimulation.神经关联的视觉审美欣赏:来自非侵入性脑刺激的见解。
Exp Brain Res. 2020 Jan;238(1):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05685-x. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
8
Motor mapping of implied actions during perception of emotional body language.感知情绪肢体语言时隐含动作的运动映射。
Brain Stimul. 2012 Apr;5(2):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.03.011. Epub 2012 Mar 31.
9
On the relation between perceived stability and aesthetic appreciation.关于感知稳定性与审美欣赏之间的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103082. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103082. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Hand perceptions induced by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the primary motor cortex.经初级运动皮层单次脉冲经颅磁刺激诱导的手知觉。
Brain Stimul. 2019 May-Jun;12(3):693-701. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.12.972. Epub 2018 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of negative aesthetic evaluations in visual art: a neuroimaging meta-analysis.视觉艺术中负面审美评价的神经关联:一项神经影像学元分析
Cereb Cortex. 2025 Jul 1;35(7). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaf156.
2
The influence of sensorimotor experience on beauty evaluation of preschool children.感觉运动经验对学龄前儿童审美评价的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jul 10;17:1138420. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1138420. eCollection 2023.
3
Can static Rorschach stimuli perceived as in motion affect corticospinal excitability?静态的罗夏墨迹刺激物被感知为运动时是否会影响皮质脊髓兴奋性?
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 13;18(7):e0287866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287866. eCollection 2023.
4
Visceromotor roots of aesthetic evaluation of pain in art: an fMRI study.艺术中疼痛审美评估的内脏运动根:一项 fMRI 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):1113-1122. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab066.