Scientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea, 33037 Pasian di Prato, Italy.
Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, M13 9PL Manchester, UK.
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104663. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aesthetic experiences could be grounded in the motor simulation of actions required to produce an art piece and of the sensorimotor states embedded in its subject (embodied aesthetic hypothesis). Here, we aimed to test these two hypotheses by assessing whether motor facilitation during artwork perception mirrors emotional or motor simulation processes. To this aim, we capitalized on single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealing a two-stage motor coding of emotional body postures: an early, non-specific activation related to emotion processing and a later action-specific activation reflecting motor simulation. We asked art-naïve individuals to rate how much they liked a series of pointillist and brushstroke canvases; photographs of artistic gardens served as control natural stimuli. After an early (150 ms) or a later (300 ms) post-stimulus delay, motor evoked potentials were recorded from wrist-extensor and finger muscles that were more involved in brushstroke- and pointillist-like painting, respectively. Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. However, in support of the embodied aesthetic hypothesis, we found in the later time window greater motor activation responses to brushstroke than pointillist canvases for the wrist-extensor, but not for the finger muscle. Furthermore, this muscle-selective facilitation was associated with lower liking ratings of brushstroke canvases and with greater empathy dispositions. These findings support the claim that simulation of the painter's movements is crucial for aesthetic experience, by documenting a link between motor simulation, dispositional empathy, and subjective appreciation in artwork perception.
感知艺术已知会在观察者的大脑中引发运动皮层的激活。这种运动激活通常归因于与艺术作品的情感效价相关的隐蔽接近反应(情感反应假说)。然而,最近的观点提出,审美体验可能基于产生艺术作品所需的动作的运动模拟,以及嵌入其主题中的感觉运动状态(具身审美假说)。在这里,我们旨在通过评估在艺术品感知过程中是否存在运动促进来检验这两种假说,该运动促进反映了情感或运动模拟过程。为此,我们利用单次脉冲经颅磁刺激揭示了情感身体姿势的两阶段运动编码:与情绪处理相关的早期非特异性激活,以及反映运动模拟的后期特定于动作的激活。我们要求艺术初学者对一系列点彩派和笔触画布的喜欢程度进行评分;艺术花园的照片作为对照自然刺激。在早期(150 毫秒)或晚期(300 毫秒)刺激后延迟后,从腕伸肌和手指肌肉记录运动诱发电位,这些肌肉分别更参与笔触和点彩派绘画。结果表明,观察两种画布风格都不会在早期时间窗口中引起肌肉的不同运动激活,不支持情感反应假说。然而,支持具身审美假说,我们发现,在较晚的时间窗口中,对于腕伸肌,笔触画布比点彩派画布引起更大的运动激活反应,但对于手指肌肉则不然。此外,这种肌肉选择性促进与笔触画布的较低喜好评分以及更大的同理心倾向相关。这些发现通过记录在艺术品感知中运动模拟、特质同理心和主观欣赏之间的联系,支持了运动模拟对于审美体验至关重要的观点。