Biomedical Ultrasound Laboratory, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Biomedical Ultrasound Laboratory, Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Ultrasonics. 2021 Feb;110:106293. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106293. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
In this paper, the development of modified beamforming methods, Filtered Delay Weight Multiply and Sum (F-DwMAS) and Filtered Delay Euclidian-Weighted Multiply and Sum (F-DewMAS), are reported. These methods were investigated on a minimum-redundancy synthetic aperture technique, called as 2 element Receive Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique (2R-SAFT), which uses one element on transmit and two consecutive elements on receive, for reducing hardware complexity without compromising much on the image quality. The performance of the developed F-DwMAS and F-DewMAS methods were compared with Delay and Sum (DAS) and recently introduced F-DMAS beamforming methods. Notably, in the proposed methods, an additional aperture window function is designed and incorporated to the F-DMAS method. The different methods of F-DwMAS, F-DewMAS, F-DMAS and DAS were compared in terms of the resulting image quality metrics, Lateral Resolution (LR), Axial Resolution (AR), Contrast Ratio (CR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), in simulation and experiments on tissue-mimicking phantoms. Experimental results show that (F-DwMAS) and {F-DewMAS} resulted in improvements of AR by (46.32% and 23.51%), {43.56% and 17.78%}, LR by (47.81% and 30.27%), {44.26% and 26.14%} and CR by (45.68% and 17.15%), {42.16% and 9.87%} compared to those obtained using DAS and F-DMAS, respectively. However, CNR of F-DwMAS and F-DewMAS was found to be 31.19% and 21.16% less compared to DAS, but 4.89% and 18.64% more than F-DMAS, respectively. Hence, it can be concluded that the image quality improved by both F-DwMAS and F-DewMAS compared to DAS and F-DMAS. Also, between F-DwMAS and F-DewMAS, the later has the advantage of ready applicability to different acquisition schemes and settings compared to the former also having an additional advantage of better CNR compared to both F-DMAS and F-DewMAS.
本文报告了改进的波束形成方法,滤波延迟加权乘法求和(F-DwMAS)和滤波延迟欧几里得加权乘法求和(F-DewMAS)的发展。这些方法是在一种最小冗余合成孔径技术上进行研究的,称为 2 个元素接收合成孔径聚焦技术(2R-SAFT),该技术在发射时使用一个元素,在接收时使用两个连续的元素,在不牺牲图像质量的情况下降低硬件复杂度。所开发的 F-DwMAS 和 F-DewMAS 方法的性能与延迟求和(DAS)和最近提出的 F-DMAS 波束形成方法进行了比较。值得注意的是,在提出的方法中,为 F-DMAS 方法设计并合并了一个附加的孔径窗口函数。在模拟和组织模拟体模的实验中,比较了 F-DwMAS、F-DewMAS、F-DMAS 和 DAS 等不同方法的图像质量指标,包括横向分辨率(LR)、轴向分辨率(AR)、对比度比(CR)和对比度噪声比(CNR)。实验结果表明,F-DwMAS 和 F-DewMAS 分别使 AR 提高了(46.32%和 23.51%)、(43.56%和 17.78%)、LR 提高了(47.81%和 30.27%)、(44.26%和 26.14%)和 CR 提高了(45.68%和 17.15%),而与 DAS 和 F-DMAS 相比,分别提高了 42.16%和 9.87%。然而,F-DwMAS 和 F-DewMAS 的 CNR 分别比 DAS 低 31.19%和 21.16%,但比 F-DMAS 分别高 4.89%和 18.64%。因此,可以得出结论,与 DAS 和 F-DMAS 相比,F-DwMAS 和 F-DewMAS 均提高了图像质量。此外,在 F-DwMAS 和 F-DewMAS 之间,后者具有比前者更容易适用于不同采集方案和设置的优势,而前者与 F-DMAS 和 F-DewMAS 相比,具有更好的 CNR 的额外优势。