Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, P.O. Box 413, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Finnish Environment Institute, Freshwater Centre, P.O. Box 413, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 15;278(Pt 2):111532. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111532. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
Mining has changed landscapes locally in northern Fennoscandia and there is an increasing pressure for exploitation of the remaining mineral deposits of the region. Mineral deposits, even if unmined, can strongly influence stream water chemistry, stream biological communities and the ability of organisms to tolerate stressors. Using data sampled from six mining areas with three active (gold and chrome), two closed (gold) and one planned mine (phosphate), we examined how mineral deposits and mining influence water chemistry and diatom and macroinvertebrate communities in subarctic streams in Finnish Lapland. We supplemented the data by additional samples compiled from databases and further assessed how variation in background geological conditions influences bioassessments of the impacts arising from mining. We found that water specific conductivity was elevated in our study streams draining through catchments with a high mineral potential. Mining effects were mainly seen as increased concentration of nitrogen. Influence of mineral deposits was detected in composition of diatom and macroinvertebrate communities, but communities in streams in areas with a high mineral potential were as diverse as those in streams in areas with a low mineral potential. Mining impacts were better detected for diatoms using a reference condition based on sites with a high than low mineral potential, while for macroinvertebrates, the responses were generally less evident, likely because of only minor effects of mining on water chemistry. Community composition and frequencies of occurrence of macroinvertebrate taxa were, however, highly similar between mine-influenced streams and reference streams with a high potential for minerals indicating that the communities are strongly structured by the natural influence of mineral deposits. Incorporating geochemistry into the reference condition would likely improve bioassessments of both taxonomic groups. Replicated monitoring in potentially impacted sites and reference sites would be the most efficient framework for detecting environmental impacts in streams draining through mineral-rich catchments.
采矿已经改变了芬兰北极圈内北部地区的景观,该地区剩余矿产资源的开采压力越来越大。即使未开采,矿床也会强烈影响溪流的水质、溪流的生物群落以及生物耐受压力源的能力。我们利用从六个矿区采集的数据进行研究,这些矿区包括三个正在开采的矿区(金和铬)、两个已关闭的矿区(金)和一个计划开采的矿区(磷矿),研究了矿床和采矿如何影响芬兰拉普兰亚北极地区溪流的水质以及硅藻和大型无脊椎动物群落。我们通过从数据库中收集的其他样本补充了数据,并进一步评估了背景地质条件的变化如何影响对采矿影响的生物评估。我们发现,在流经高矿产潜力流域的溪流中,水的比电导率升高。采矿的影响主要表现为氮浓度的增加。矿床的影响在硅藻和大型无脊椎动物群落的组成中有所体现,但高矿产潜力流域的溪流中的群落与低矿产潜力流域的溪流中的群落一样多样化。使用基于高矿产潜力而非低矿产潜力站点的参考条件,可以更好地检测到基于硅藻的采矿影响,而对于大型无脊椎动物,其反应通常不太明显,这可能是因为采矿对水质的影响较小。然而,受采矿影响的溪流与具有高矿产潜力的参考溪流之间的大型无脊椎动物类群的群落组成和出现频率非常相似,这表明这些群落受到矿床自然影响的强烈构建。将地球化学纳入参考条件中可能会改善对这两个分类群的生物评估。在潜在受影响的地点和参考地点进行重复监测,是检测富含矿产的流域溪流中环境影响的最有效框架。