• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

承认癌症是一种家族性疾病:癌症环境下家庭护理的系统评价。

Acknowledging cancer as a family disease: A systematic review of family care in the cancer setting.

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, Menzies Health Institute, Griffith University, 4131, Queensland, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, 3125, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Dec;49:101841. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101841. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101841
PMID:33130424
Abstract

PURPOSE

Family members are a part of the team to improve the outcomes of the person with cancer. Families require support and information to optimise their care, however, their needs are often unacknowledged and within clinical areas there is a lack of family focused interventions. Studies highlight families' needs but lack a family representation. The aim was to explore research with family as the unit-of-care during cancer treatment.

METHOD

The Pickering systematic quantitative literature review method; a 15-step process from searching, database development and analysis was followed. Research published 2008-2019 within databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, Cochrane, CINAHL; key words, 'family* or caregiver*, and cancer*, neoplasm* and coping*, distress* in November 2019. Quality assessment completed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, descriptive quantitative analysis and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Studies involving patients and family members were included in the review (N = 73). The analysis identified participants had a mean age of 58 years and primarily lung, breast or prostate cancer. Over 80% were from America and European countries; 93% had a dyad sample, quantitative studies (76%). There was eight intervention studies between four to sixteen weeks long, focused on family wellbeing. Themes described the impact of cancer on the whole family, the importance of communication between family members, and resources for family members.

CONCLUSION

The review identified four main scales and optimum intervention styles. Family research in the adult cancer needs to focus on intervention studies, increase international focus and inclusion of other family members such as children, friends and older adults.

摘要

目的

家庭成员是提高癌症患者治疗效果的团队成员之一。为了优化他们的护理,家庭成员需要获得支持和信息,但他们的需求往往未得到认可,而且在临床领域缺乏以家庭为中心的干预措施。研究强调了家庭的需求,但缺乏家庭代表。本研究旨在探讨以家庭为癌症治疗护理单元的研究。

方法

采用皮克林系统的定量文献综述方法;遵循从搜索、数据库开发到分析的 15 个步骤。2008 年至 2019 年期间,在 MEDLINE、SCOPUS、PsycINFO、Cochrane、CINAHL 等数据库中使用“家庭或照顾者、癌症*、肿瘤和应对、压力*”等关键词进行搜索,于 2019 年 11 月完成检索。使用混合方法评价工具、描述性定量分析和主题分析完成质量评估。

结果

本研究纳入了涉及患者及其家庭成员的研究(N=73)。分析确定参与者的平均年龄为 58 岁,主要患有肺癌、乳腺癌或前列腺癌。超过 80%的参与者来自美国和欧洲国家;93%的研究采用了二元样本,且为定量研究(76%)。有 8 项干预研究持续时间为 4 至 16 周,主要集中在家庭幸福感上。主题描述了癌症对整个家庭的影响、家庭成员之间沟通的重要性以及为家庭成员提供的资源。

结论

本研究确定了四项主要量表和最佳干预方式。成人癌症的家庭研究需要关注干预研究,增加国际关注,并纳入儿童、朋友和老年人等其他家庭成员。

相似文献

1
Acknowledging cancer as a family disease: A systematic review of family care in the cancer setting.承认癌症是一种家族性疾病:癌症环境下家庭护理的系统评价。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2020 Dec;49:101841. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101841. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
2
Family care for the older person with cancer.对老年癌症患者的家庭护理。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2006 Feb;22(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2005.10.006.
3
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
4
Health care professionals' perspectives of the experiences of family caregivers during in-patient cancer care.医疗保健专业人员对住院癌症护理期间家庭照顾者经历的看法。
J Fam Nurs. 2014 Nov;20(4):462-86. doi: 10.1177/1074840714556179. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
5
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
6
The effectivness of a strengths-oriented therapeutic conversation intervention on perceived support, well-being and burden among family caregivers in palliative home-care.一项以优势为导向的治疗性对话干预措施对姑息性家庭护理中家庭照顾者的感知支持、幸福感和负担的有效性。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):3018-3031. doi: 10.1111/jan.14089. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
Caregiving experiences of Korean family caregivers of cancer patients: An integrative literature review.癌症患者韩国家庭照顾者的照顾经验:综合文献回顾。
Psychooncology. 2020 Oct;29(10):1486-1503. doi: 10.1002/pon.5498. Epub 2020 Aug 23.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Experiences of caregivers of patients with metastatic cancer: What can we learn from them to better support them?转移性癌症患者照顾者的经历:我们能从他们身上学到什么以更好地支持他们?
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Feb;32:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 25.
10
Mutual Needs and Wishes of Cancer Patients and Their family Caregivers During the Last Week of Life: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在生命最后一周的相互需求与愿望:一项描述性现象学研究
J Holist Nurs. 2016 Mar;34(1):24-34. doi: 10.1177/0898010115581936. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of health information-seeking among patients with cancer in China: a qualitative study.中国癌症患者健康信息寻求经历:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 26;13:1584952. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1584952. eCollection 2025.
2
The Dyadic Experience of a New Breast Cancer Diagnosis Into the Shared Decision-Making Process: A Qualitative Analysis.新确诊乳腺癌患者融入共同决策过程的二元体验:一项定性分析。
Psychooncology. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70277. doi: 10.1002/pon.70277.
3
Breast Cancer Disparities in the LGBTQ + Community: How to Move Towards Inclusive Care from Screening to Survivorship.
LGBTQ+ 群体中的乳腺癌差异:从筛查到康复,如何实现包容性护理。
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2025 Dec;17(1). doi: 10.1007/s12609-025-00597-y. Epub 2025 Jul 11.
4
Navigating the Hardship Together: Factors Associated With Couple Relationship Functioning in Parents With Cancer Who Have Dependent Children.共同应对困境:患有癌症且有未成年子女的父母的夫妻关系功能相关因素。
Psychooncology. 2025 Aug;34(8):e70245. doi: 10.1002/pon.70245.
5
A qualitative study of family caregivers' experiences in caring for breast cancer patients.一项关于家庭护理人员照顾乳腺癌患者经历的定性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09198-2.
6
Web-Based Psychoeducational Intervention to Improve Family Caregiver Preparedness in Specialized Palliative Home Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的心理教育干预以提高专业姑息家庭护理中家庭照顾者的准备程度:一项随机对照试验
Psychooncology. 2025 Jun;34(6):e70202. doi: 10.1002/pon.70202.
7
Moral conflicts among patients-caregivers dyads in oncological care pathway: a systematic review of the ethical literature.肿瘤护理路径中患者与护理人员二元组之间的道德冲突:伦理文献的系统综述
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 6;33(7):548. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09548-w.
8
Aiming for survival: a qualitative single case study of support for family members across the care process in outpatient colorectal cancer care.以生存为目标:一项关于门诊结直肠癌护理全过程中对家庭成员支持的定性单案例研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 May 12;25(1):856. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14245-2.
9
Co-design of family interventions in cancer: a scoping review protocol to assess key methods and processes.癌症家庭干预的共同设计:一项评估关键方法和流程的范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 21;15(3):e093961. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093961.
10
Perceived stress and family adaptability in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: the chain-mediated effect of social support and family resilience.接受放射治疗的头颈癌患者的感知压力与家庭适应性:社会支持和家庭复原力的链式中介效应
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 17;15:1488196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1488196. eCollection 2024.