• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故与脑膜瘤:47 例分析。

Medical malpractice and meningiomas: an analysis of 47 cases.

机构信息

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, New York.

2Department of Neurological Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York; and.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E22. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20598.

DOI:10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20598
PMID:33130607
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Among medical practices, surgical fields, including neurosurgery, are at a high risk for medical malpractice litigation. With meningiomas contributing to 10% of the total neurosurgery litigation cases, the aim of this study was to identify demographic characteristics, reasons for litigation, and surgical complications commonly reported in these cases. This analysis serves to increase neurosurgeons' awareness of factors associated with medical malpractice litigation.

METHODS

The online legal database Westlaw was utilized to query public litigation cases related to the medical management of meningiomas between December 1985 and May 2020. Variables extracted included the following: plaintiff and defendant demographics, litigation category, plaintiff medical complaints, and trial outcomes. The authors compared these characteristics between cases with decisions in favor of the defendant and those with decisions in favor of the plaintiff.

RESULTS

A total of 47 cases met the inclusion criteria. Failure to diagnose (68.1%) was the most common type of malpractice claim, and surgical complications (19.1%), motor weakness (33%), and financial loss (33%) were cited as the most common postoperative complaints. Individual specialties that most often required defense due to malpractice claims were radiology (21.7%) and neurosurgery (19.6%). The jury verdict was in favor of the defense in 51.1% of cases and in favor of the plaintiff in 27.7% of cases. A settlement was reached in 19.1% of cases. The mean payout for a verdict in favor of the plaintiff was $3,409,650.22, while the mean payout for settlements was $867,555.56. The greatest average payout for specialties was in neurosurgery at $3,414,400, followed by radiology at $3,192,960. Cases with a verdict in favor of the plaintiff were more likely to involve an internal medicine physician as a defendant (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Over one-half of the cases resulted in a defendant's verdict with failure to diagnose cited as the most common reason for litigation. Radiology and neurosurgery were the most common specialties for legal cases and also had some of the largest average payouts based on specialty. Motor weakness and financial loss were the most common plaintiff postoperative complaints. These findings may inform surgeons on active measures to take, such as increasing focus on diagnostic accuracy and reducing specific postoperative complaints, such as motor weakness, through risk management and prophylactic measures, to reduce unfavorable legal outcomes.

摘要

目的

在医疗实践中,包括神经外科在内的外科领域存在着较高的医疗事故诉讼风险。脑膜瘤占神经外科总诉讼案件的 10%,本研究旨在确定这些病例中常见的人口统计学特征、诉讼原因和手术并发症。本分析旨在提高神经外科医生对与医疗事故诉讼相关因素的认识。

方法

本研究使用在线法律数据库 Westlaw 检索了 1985 年 12 月至 2020 年 5 月期间与脑膜瘤医疗管理相关的公开诉讼案例。提取的变量包括:原告和被告的人口统计学特征、诉讼类别、原告的医疗投诉和审判结果。作者比较了这些特征在有利于被告的案件和有利于原告的案件之间的差异。

结果

共有 47 例符合纳入标准。漏诊(68.1%)是最常见的医疗事故索赔类型,手术并发症(19.1%)、运动无力(33%)和经济损失(33%)是最常见的术后投诉。由于医疗事故索赔而最需要辩护的个别专业是放射科(21.7%)和神经外科(19.6%)。陪审团裁决有利于被告的案件占 51.1%,有利于原告的案件占 27.7%。19.1%的案件达成和解。有利于原告的判决的平均赔偿金为 3409650.22 美元,和解的平均赔偿金为 867555.56 美元。专业平均支出最高的是神经外科,为 3414400 美元,其次是放射科,为 3192960 美元。有利于原告的判决的案件更有可能涉及内科医生作为被告(p=0.007)。

结论

超过一半的案件的判决有利于被告,漏诊是诉讼的最常见原因。放射科和神经外科是法律案件最常见的专业,也是根据专业划分平均支出最高的科室。运动无力和经济损失是最常见的原告术后投诉。这些发现可以为外科医生提供信息,告知他们采取积极措施,如提高诊断准确性,并通过风险管理和预防措施减少特定的术后投诉,如运动无力,以降低不利的法律后果。

相似文献

1
Medical malpractice and meningiomas: an analysis of 47 cases.医疗事故与脑膜瘤:47 例分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Nov;49(5):E22. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.FOCUS20598.
2
Delayed Diagnosis Is the Primary Cause of Sarcoma Litigation: Analysis of Malpractice Claims in the United States.延迟诊断是肉瘤诉讼的主要原因:美国医疗事故索赔分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Oct;478(10):2239-2253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001340.
3
Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: A Comprehensive Analysis.神经外科医疗事故:全面分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Feb;110:e552-e559. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.051. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
Malpractice litigation in elective lumbar spinal fusion: a comprehensive review of reported legal claims in the U.S. in the past 50 years.选择性腰椎融合术的医疗事故诉讼:对过去 50 年美国报告的法律索赔进行的全面综述。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
5
Medical malpractice and epidural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of 101 cases in the United States.医疗事故与硬膜外血肿:美国101例病例的回顾性分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Mar 4;86(4):1873-1880. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001581. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Medical Malpractice and Trigeminal Neuralgia: An Analysis of 49 Cases.医疗事故与三叉神经痛:49 例分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 May;79(5):1026.e1-1026.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.041. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
Medical malpractice and intracranial hemorrhages in the U.S.: An analysis of 121 cases over 35 years.美国的医疗事故与颅内出血:35年期间121例病例分析
Heliyon. 2023 Mar 31;9(4):e14885. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14885. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Malpractice litigation following spine surgery.脊柱手术后的医疗事故诉讼。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Oct;27(4):470-475. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16646. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
9
Descriptive Analysis of Federal and State Interventional Pain Malpractice Litigation in the United States: A Pilot Investigation.美国联邦和州干预性疼痛医疗过失诉讼的描述性分析:一项初步调查。
Pain Physician. 2020 Jul;23(4):413-422.
10
An analysis of malpractice litigation related to the management of brain aneurysms.脑动脉瘤管理相关医疗纠纷分析
J Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;127(5):1077-1083. doi: 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161124. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Subdural hematomas and medical malpractice in the USA: an analysis of 314 patients.美国的硬膜下血肿与医疗事故:314例患者的分析
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2025 May 30;10(2):e001462. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001462. eCollection 2025.
2
Medical Malpractice in Neurosurgery: An Analysis of Claims in the Netherlands.神经外科医疗事故:荷兰索赔案例分析
Neurosurgery. 2025 Mar 1;96(3):673-680. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003117. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Analysis of the characteristics, efficiency, and influencing factors of third-party mediation mechanisms for resolving medical disputes in public hospitals in China.
分析中国公立医院解决医疗纠纷第三方调解机制的特点、效率及影响因素。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jul 9;24(1):1823. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19366-0.
4
Medical malpractice and epidural hematomas: a retrospective analysis of 101 cases in the United States.医疗事故与硬膜外血肿:美国101例病例的回顾性分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Mar 4;86(4):1873-1880. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001581. eCollection 2024 Apr.