van der Vlegel-Brouwer Wilma, van Kemenade Everard, Stein K Viktoria, Goodwin Nick, Miller Robin
University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, NL.
International Journal of Integrated Care, AU.
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Oct 21;20(4):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5627.
The International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC) recently celebrated its 20 International Conference (ICIC20) through a virtual event that brought together patients and carers, academics, care professionals, NGOs, policy-makers and industry partners from across the global integrated care community [1]. The International Journal for Integrated Care (IJIC) used this opportunity to host a workshop on published research in integrated care, specifically to reflect on the quality of existing scientific enquiry. A lively discussion on the current state of integrated care research concluded that there remained significant shortcomings to current methodologies - for example, in their ability to provide the depth of understanding required to support the knowledge needed to best inform policy and practice, particularly when addressing people-centredness. In part, the debate recognized how the nature of existing research funding, and prevailing attitudes and preferences towards certain research methodologies, were partly to blame (as has been noted by IJIC previously [23]). The workshop debated how research and researchers must change their focus in order to better contribute to the tenet of people-centred integrated care.
国际综合护理基金会(IFIC)最近通过一场虚拟活动庆祝了其第20届国际会议(ICIC20),该活动汇聚了来自全球综合护理领域的患者及护理人员、学者、护理专业人员、非政府组织、政策制定者和行业合作伙伴[1]。《国际综合护理杂志》(IJIC)借此机会举办了一场关于综合护理已发表研究的研讨会,特别是反思现有科学探究的质量。一场关于综合护理研究现状的热烈讨论得出结论,当前方法仍存在重大缺陷——例如,在提供支持最佳政策和实践所需知识所需的深入理解能力方面,尤其是在以人为主的问题上。部分辩论认识到,现有研究资金的性质以及对某些研究方法的普遍态度和偏好应为此承担部分责任(正如IJIC此前所指出的[23])。研讨会讨论了研究及研究人员必须如何改变重点,以便更好地为人本位综合护理的宗旨做出贡献。