Gillmann Kevin, Mansouri Kaweh
Glaucoma Research Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Swiss Visio, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2020 Oct 25;15(4):531-546. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v15i4.7792. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
Glaucoma management has changed dramatically over the last decades, through clinical advances and technological revolutions. This review discusses the latest innovations and challenges faced in the field around three major axes: minimally-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), implantable sensors and injectable therapeutics. Indeed, the vast number of recently developed MIGS techniques has not only provided clinicians with a wide range of therapeutic options, but they have also enabled them to adjust their therapies more finely which may have contributed a more patient-centric decision-making process. Yet, despite considerable advances in the field, the wide heterogeneity in clinical trial designs blurs the surgical outcomes, specificities and indications. Thus, more high-quality data are required to make the choice of a specific MIGS procedure more than an educated guess. Beyond the scope of MIGS, the potential of IOP telemetry for self-assessment of IOP-control through implantable sensors is developing into a real option for clinicians and an empowering opportunity for patients. Indeed, providing patients with direct feedback enables them to take control and have a clearer representation of their care, in turn leading to a better control of the disease. However, there are potential issues with self-monitoring of IOP, such as increased anxiety levels induced by measured IOP fluctuations and peaks, leading to patients self-treating during IOP spikes and additional office visits. Furthermore, the advent of implantable therapeutics may soon provide yet another step towards personalized glaucoma treatment, by offering not only an efficient alternative to current treatments, but also a therapeutic option that may better adapt to patients' lifestyle. After several decades of relative stagnation through the last century, glaucoma has now entered what many view as a golden age for the specialty. Like every revolution, this one brings its fair share of uncertainty, clinical questioning and uneasy periods of adaptation to ever-changing expectations. Yet, while it is impossible to guess what the landscape of glaucoma surgery will be like in ten or fifteen years, data suggest a bright outlook both for patients and clinicians.
在过去几十年中,随着临床进展和技术革命,青光眼的治疗发生了巨大变化。本综述围绕三个主要方面探讨了该领域面临的最新创新和挑战:微创青光眼手术(MIGS)、可植入传感器和可注射治疗药物。事实上,最近开发的大量MIGS技术不仅为临床医生提供了广泛的治疗选择,还使他们能够更精细地调整治疗方案,这可能有助于形成更以患者为中心的决策过程。然而,尽管该领域取得了长足进展,但临床试验设计的广泛异质性模糊了手术结果、特殊性和适应症。因此,需要更多高质量的数据,以便在选择特定的MIGS手术时不仅仅是基于经验猜测。除了MIGS的范畴,通过可植入传感器进行眼压遥测以自我评估眼压控制的潜力正在发展成为临床医生的一个切实选择,也是赋予患者权力的一个机会。的确,为患者提供直接反馈能使他们掌控自己的病情,并对自己的治疗有更清晰的认识,进而更好地控制疾病。然而,眼压自我监测存在一些潜在问题,比如测量到的眼压波动和峰值会导致焦虑水平增加,从而使患者在眼压峰值时自行治疗并增加门诊就诊次数。此外,可植入治疗药物的出现可能很快为个性化青光眼治疗带来又一步进展,它不仅为当前治疗提供了一种有效的替代方案,还提供了一种可能更适应患者生活方式的治疗选择。在上个世纪经历了几十年的相对停滞之后,青光眼现在已进入许多人视为该专业黄金时代的阶段。如同每一次变革一样,这次变革也带来了相当多的不确定性、临床质疑以及适应不断变化的期望的艰难时期。然而,虽然无法预测未来十年或十五年青光眼手术的局面会是怎样,但数据表明对患者和临床医生来说前景光明。