Nickell Jason, Bryant Lonty, Lechtenberg Kelly F, Cull Charley
Allflex Livestock Intelligence, Madison, WI, United States.
Merck Animal Health, De Soto, KS, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Oct 7;7:571697. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.571697. eCollection 2020.
The study objective was to compare clinical and performance outcomes among feedlot steers treated for bovine respiratory disease (BRD) with tildipirosin (TIL), flunixin transdermal solution (FTS; topical application), or both, based on a refined BRD case-definition. Crossbred steer calves ( = 2,380) were enrolled based on a clinical illness score (CIS) of 1-3; a rectal temperature between >102.5° F and ≤103.9° F; and a Whisper Score (WS) = 1 or ≥2. Within each WS stratum, steers were randomly allocated to Saline, TIL, FTS, or TIL + FTS to reflect a 2 × 2 factorial design. Individual health and performance outcomes were measured on Day 60 and closeout. From Day 0 through Day 60, in both strata, TIL resulted in significantly ( ≤ 0.05) fewer BRD retreatment events, fewer 3rd BRD treatments, fewer steers that did not finish, and greater average daily gain when compared to steers that were not treated with TIL. From Day 0 through closeout, cattle with a WS ≥ 2, treated with TIL had fewer animals ( ≤ 0.05) that did not finish compared to steers not treated with TIL. In this study, feedlot steers with clinical signs of BRD and rectal temperatures lower than traditional cutoffs displayed a positive response to antimicrobial therapy. A clear benefit of FTS was not observed in this study. Calves with a WS ≥ 2 were lighter at the time of first BRD treatment compared to calves with a WS = 1. However, standalone TIL therapy was the optimal BRD treatment modality across WS strata in this study.
本研究的目的是基于完善的牛呼吸道疾病(BRD)病例定义,比较接受替地珠单抗(TIL)、氟尼辛透皮溶液(FTS;局部应用)或两者治疗的饲养场育肥牛的临床和生产性能结果。根据1-3的临床疾病评分(CIS)、高于102.5°F且≤103.9°F的直肠温度以及低语评分(WS)=1或≥2,纳入杂交育肥牛犊(n = 2380头)。在每个WS分层内,将育肥牛随机分配至生理盐水组、TIL组、FTS组或TIL + FTS组,以反映2×2析因设计。在第60天和结束时测量个体健康和生产性能结果。从第0天到第60天,在两个分层中,与未接受TIL治疗的育肥牛相比,TIL治疗导致显著(P≤0.05)更少的BRD再治疗事件、更少的第三次BRD治疗、更少的未完成饲养的育肥牛以及更高的平均日增重。从第0天到结束时,与未接受TIL治疗的育肥牛相比,WS≥2且接受TIL治疗的牛未完成饲养的数量更少(P≤0.05)。在本研究中,有BRD临床症状且直肠温度低于传统临界值的饲养场育肥牛对抗菌治疗表现出阳性反应。在本研究中未观察到FTS的明显益处。与WS = 1的牛犊相比,WS≥2的牛犊在首次BRD治疗时体重更轻。然而,在本研究中,单独的TIL治疗是跨WS分层的最佳BRD治疗方式。