Lucchetti Giancarlo, Góes Leonardo Garcia, Amaral Stefani Garbulio, Ganadjian Gabriela Terzian, Andrade Isabelle, Almeida Paulo Othávio de Araújo, do Carmo Victor Mendes, Manso Maria Elisa Gonzalez
School of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
School of Medicine, São Camilo University Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Sep;67(6):672-679. doi: 10.1177/0020764020970996. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
Evidence shows that religiosity and spirituality (R/S) are highly used in critical moments of life and that these beliefs are associated with clinical outcomes. However, further studies are needed to assess these beliefs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
To evaluate the use of R/S during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil and to investigate the association between R/S and the mental health consequences of social isolation.
Cross-sectional study conducted in May 2020. Online surveys were carried out assessing sociodemographics, R/S measures, and social isolation characteristics and mental health consequences (hopefulness, fear, worrying and sadness). Adjusted regression models were used.
A total of 485 participants were included from all regions of Brazil. There was a high use of religious and spiritual beliefs during the pandemic and this use was associated with better mental health outcomes. Lower levels of worrying were associated with greater private religious activities (OR = 0.466, CI 95%: 0.307-0.706), religious attendance (OR = 0.587, CI 95%: 0.395-0.871), spiritual growth (OR = 0.667, CI 95%: 0.448-0.993) and with an increase in religious activities (OR = 0.660, CI 95%: 0.442-0.986); lower levels of fear were associated with greater private religious activities (OR = 0.632, CI 95%: 0.422-0.949) and spiritual growth (OR = 0.588, CI 95%: 0.392-0.882) and, lower levels of sadness (OR = 0.646, CI 95%: 0.418-0.997) were associated with spiritual growth. Finally, hope was associated with all R/S variables in different degrees (ranging from OR = 1.706 to 3.615).
R/S seem to have an important role on the relief of suffering, having an influence on health outcomes and minimizing the consequences of social isolation. These results highlight the importance of public health measures that ensure the continuity of R/S activities during the pandemic and the training of healthcare professionals to address these issues.
有证据表明,宗教信仰和精神寄托(R/S)在人生关键时刻被大量运用,且这些信仰与临床结果相关。然而,在新冠疫情期间,仍需进一步研究来评估这些信仰。
评估在巴西新冠疫情期间R/S的运用情况,并调查R/S与社交隔离对心理健康影响之间的关联。
于2020年5月开展横断面研究。通过在线调查评估社会人口统计学、R/S测量指标、社交隔离特征以及心理健康影响(希望、恐惧、担忧和悲伤)。采用调整后的回归模型。
共纳入来自巴西所有地区的485名参与者。疫情期间宗教和精神信仰的运用较为广泛,且这种运用与更好的心理健康结果相关。较低的担忧程度与更多的私人宗教活动(OR = 0.466,95%置信区间:0.307 - 0.706)、宗教礼拜(OR = 0.587,95%置信区间:0.395 - 0.871)、精神成长(OR = 0.667,95%置信区间:0.448 - 0.993)以及宗教活动增加(OR = 0.660,95%置信区间:0.442 - 0.986)相关;较低的恐惧程度与更多的私人宗教活动(OR = 0.632,95%置信区间:0.422 - 0.949)和精神成长(OR = 0.588,95%置信区间:0.392 - 0.882)相关,较低的悲伤程度(OR = 0.646,95%置信区间:0.418 - 0.997)与精神成长相关。最后,希望与所有R/S变量在不同程度上相关(OR范围为1.706至3.615)。
R/S似乎在减轻痛苦方面发挥着重要作用,对健康结果产生影响,并将社交隔离的后果降至最低。这些结果凸显了公共卫生措施的重要性,即在疫情期间确保R/S活动的连续性,以及对医护人员进行培训以解决这些问题。