Education and Health Faculty, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain.
Exercise and Sport Sciences, Education and Humanities Faculty, Francisco de Vitoria University, UFV, Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Dec;21(12):1617-1627. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1845816. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
(i) to compare the effects of two different low-volume resistance priming sessions, where the external load is modified on neuromuscular performance after 6 h of rest; and (ii) to identify the effects on psychological readiness in participants with resistance training experience. Eleven participants (Body mass: 77.0 ± 8.9 kg; Body height: 1.76 ± 0.08 m; Half squat repetition maximum: 139.8 ± 22.4 kg) performed the priming session under three experimental conditions in a randomized and cross-over design during the morning. The control (CON) condition: no resistance training, "optimal load" (OL) condition: two half-squat sets with a velocity loss of around 20% were performed with the "optimal load", and 80% of repetition maximum (80% RM) condition: 2 half-squat sets with a velocity loss of around 20% were performed with the 80% RM. Countermovement jump (CMJ), mean power with OL (MP) and 80% RM (MP), and mean velocity with OL (MV) and 80% RM (MV) were assessed six hours after the intervention. Subjective readiness was also recorded prior to resistance training and evaluation. Significance was set at <0.05. CMJ was higher after the 80% RM intervention than CON (<0.001; Δ = 6.5% [3.4-9.5]). MP and MV seemed to be unaffected by both morning sessions. Higher MP ( = 0.044; Δ = 9.7% [4.0-15.6]; = 0.24[0.10-0.37]) and MV ( = 0.004; Δ = 8.1% [3.2-13.3]; = 0.32[0.13-0.52]) after 80% RM than after CON were observed. No effect was observed on psychological readiness. Conclusions: 80% RM priming session increased CMJ height and the capacity to generate power and velocity under a high-load condition without any effect on psychological readiness.
(i)比较两种不同低容量阻力起动方案的效果,其中在休息 6 小时后,外部负荷会改变神经肌肉性能;(ii)确定在具有抗阻训练经验的参与者中对心理准备的影响。11 名参与者(体重:77.0±8.9kg;身高:1.76±0.08m;半蹲重复最大:139.8±22.4kg)在上午以随机交叉设计进行了 3 种实验条件下的起动方案。对照组(CON):不进行抗阻训练;“最佳负荷”(OL)条件:进行 2 组半蹲,速度损失约为 20%,使用“最佳负荷”;80%重复最大(80%RM)条件:进行 2 组半蹲,速度损失约为 20%,使用 80%RM。在干预后 6 小时评估了下蹲跳(CMJ)、OL 时的平均功率(MP)和 80%RM(MP)、OL 时的平均速度(MV)和 80%RM(MV)。在抗阻训练和评估前也记录了主观准备情况。显著性设为 <0.05。80%RM 干预后 CMJ 高于 CON(<0.001;Δ=6.5%[3.4-9.5])。MP 和 MV 似乎不受两个上午方案的影响。80%RM 后 MP(=0.044;Δ=9.7%[4.0-15.6];=0.24[0.10-0.37])和 MV(=0.004;Δ=8.1%[3.2-13.3];=0.32[0.13-0.52])高于 CON。在心理准备方面没有观察到效果。结论:80%RM 起动方案增加了 CMJ 高度和在高负荷条件下产生力量和速度的能力,而对心理准备没有任何影响。