Hickmott Landyn M, Butcher Scotty J, Chilibeck Philip D
College of Medicine, Health Sciences Program, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 May;125(5):1221-1255. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05709-1. Epub 2025 Jan 26.
Resistance training (RT) load and volume are considered crucial variables to appropriately prescribe and manage for eliciting the targeted acute responses (i.e., minimizing neuromuscular fatigue) and chronic adaptations (i.e., maximizing neuromuscular adaptations). In traditional RT contexts, load and volume are generally pre-prescribed; thereby, potentially yielding sub-optimal outcomes. A RT concept that individualizes programming is autoregulation: a systematic two-step feedback process involving, (1) monitoring performance and its constituents (fitness, fatigue, and readiness) across multiple time frames (short-, moderate-, and long-term); and (2) adjusting programming (i.e., load and volume) to elicit the targeted goals (i.e., responses and adaptations). A growing body of load and volume autoregulation research has accelerated recently, with several meta-analyses suggesting that autoregulation may provide a small advantage over traditional RT. Nonetheless, the existing literature has typically conceptualized these current autoregulation methods as standalone practices, which has limited their extensive utility in research and applied settings. The primary purpose of this review was three-fold. Initially, we synthesized the current methods of load and volume autoregulation, while disseminating each method's main advantages and limitations. Second, we conceptualized a theoretical Integrated Velocity Model (IVM) that integrates the current methods for a more holistic perspective of autoregulation that may potentially augment its benefits. Lastly, we illustrated how the IVM may be compared to the current methods for future directions and how it may be implemented for practical applications. We hope that this review assists to contextualize a novel autoregulation framework to help inform future investigations for researchers and practices for RT professionals.
抗阻训练(RT)的负荷和训练量被认为是适当规定和管理以引发目标急性反应(即最小化神经肌肉疲劳)和慢性适应(即最大化神经肌肉适应)的关键变量。在传统的抗阻训练环境中,负荷和训练量通常是预先规定的;因此,可能会产生次优结果。一种使训练计划个性化的抗阻训练概念是自动调节:一个系统的两步反馈过程,包括:(1)在多个时间框架(短期、中期和长期)内监测表现及其组成部分(体能、疲劳和准备状态);(2)调整训练计划(即负荷和训练量)以实现目标(即反应和适应)。最近,越来越多关于负荷和训练量自动调节的研究加速进行,几项荟萃分析表明,自动调节可能比传统抗阻训练有一点优势。尽管如此,现有文献通常将这些当前的自动调节方法概念化为独立的做法,这限制了它们在研究和应用环境中的广泛应用。本综述的主要目的有三个方面。首先,我们综合了当前负荷和训练量自动调节的方法,同时阐述了每种方法的主要优点和局限性。其次,我们构思了一个理论上的综合速度模型(IVM),该模型整合了当前方法,以便从更全面的角度看待自动调节,这可能会增强其益处。最后,我们说明了如何将IVM与当前方法进行比较以确定未来方向,以及如何将其应用于实际。我们希望本综述有助于将一个新的自动调节框架置于具体情境中,以帮助为研究人员的未来研究和抗阻训练专业人员的实践提供信息。