Russ David W, Amano Shinichi, Law Timothy D, Thomas James S, Clark Brian C
Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Division of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(1):139-147. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200079.
Sorensen Test time-to-task-failure (TTF) predicts several low back pain (LBP) clinical outcomes, including recurrence. Because the test is described as a measure of trunk extensor (TE) muscle endurance, LBP rehabilitation programs often emphasize endurance training, but the direct role of TE muscle function on Sorensen Test-TTF remains unclear.
To assess the discriminative and associative properties of multiple markers of isolated TE performance with regard to Sorensen Test-TTF in individuals with recurrent LBP.
Secondary analysis of baseline measures from participants in a registered (NCT02308189) trial (10 men; 20 women) was performed. Participants were classified by Sorensen Test-TTF as high, moderate or low risk for subsequent LBP episodes, and compared to determine if classification could discriminate differences in TE function. Correlations between Sorensen Test-TTF and isolated TE performance, anthropometrics and disability were investigated.
Individuals at risk of subsequent LBP episodes had greater perceived disability and fat mass/TE strength ratios (P⩽ 0.05) than those not at risk. Modest, significant (r= 0.36-0.42, P⩽ 0.05) associations were found between Sorensen Test-TTF, TE endurance and fat mass/TE strength. Exploratory analyses suggested possible sex-specific differences related to Sorensen Test-TTF.
Isolated TE muscle endurance is only one of several factors with similar influence on Sorensen Test-TFF, thus LBP rehabilitation strategies should consider other factors, including TE strength, anthropometrics and perceived disability.
索伦森测试任务失败时间(TTF)可预测多种腰痛(LBP)临床结局,包括复发情况。由于该测试被描述为躯干伸肌(TE)肌肉耐力的一种测量方法,LBP康复计划通常强调耐力训练,但TE肌肉功能对索伦森测试TTF的直接作用仍不清楚。
评估复发性LBP个体中,孤立TE表现的多个标志物与索伦森测试TTF相关的判别和关联特性。
对一项注册试验(NCT02308189)(10名男性;20名女性)参与者的基线测量进行二次分析。参与者根据索伦森测试TTF被分类为后续LBP发作的高、中或低风险,并进行比较以确定分类是否能区分TE功能差异。研究了索伦森测试TTF与孤立TE表现、人体测量学和残疾之间的相关性。
有后续LBP发作风险的个体比无风险个体有更高的感知残疾和脂肪量/TE力量比(P⩽0.05)。在索伦森测试TTF、TE耐力和脂肪量/TE力量之间发现了适度的显著关联(r = 0.36 - 0.42,P⩽0.05)。探索性分析表明与索伦森测试TTF可能存在性别特异性差异。
孤立的TE肌肉耐力只是对索伦森测试TFF有类似影响的几个因素之一,因此LBP康复策略应考虑其他因素,包括TE力量、人体测量学和感知残疾。