Suppr超能文献

多项肌肉功能测量指标会影响复发性下背痛患者的索伦森试验表现。

Multiple measures of muscle function influence Sorensen Test performance in individuals with recurrent low back pain.

作者信息

Russ David W, Amano Shinichi, Law Timothy D, Thomas James S, Clark Brian C

机构信息

Ohio Musculoskeletal and Neurological Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.

Division of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation and Communication Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(1):139-147. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200079.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sorensen Test time-to-task-failure (TTF) predicts several low back pain (LBP) clinical outcomes, including recurrence. Because the test is described as a measure of trunk extensor (TE) muscle endurance, LBP rehabilitation programs often emphasize endurance training, but the direct role of TE muscle function on Sorensen Test-TTF remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the discriminative and associative properties of multiple markers of isolated TE performance with regard to Sorensen Test-TTF in individuals with recurrent LBP.

METHOD

Secondary analysis of baseline measures from participants in a registered (NCT02308189) trial (10 men; 20 women) was performed. Participants were classified by Sorensen Test-TTF as high, moderate or low risk for subsequent LBP episodes, and compared to determine if classification could discriminate differences in TE function. Correlations between Sorensen Test-TTF and isolated TE performance, anthropometrics and disability were investigated.

RESULTS

Individuals at risk of subsequent LBP episodes had greater perceived disability and fat mass/TE strength ratios (P⩽ 0.05) than those not at risk. Modest, significant (r= 0.36-0.42, P⩽ 0.05) associations were found between Sorensen Test-TTF, TE endurance and fat mass/TE strength. Exploratory analyses suggested possible sex-specific differences related to Sorensen Test-TTF.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated TE muscle endurance is only one of several factors with similar influence on Sorensen Test-TFF, thus LBP rehabilitation strategies should consider other factors, including TE strength, anthropometrics and perceived disability.

摘要

背景

索伦森测试任务失败时间(TTF)可预测多种腰痛(LBP)临床结局,包括复发情况。由于该测试被描述为躯干伸肌(TE)肌肉耐力的一种测量方法,LBP康复计划通常强调耐力训练,但TE肌肉功能对索伦森测试TTF的直接作用仍不清楚。

目的

评估复发性LBP个体中,孤立TE表现的多个标志物与索伦森测试TTF相关的判别和关联特性。

方法

对一项注册试验(NCT02308189)(10名男性;20名女性)参与者的基线测量进行二次分析。参与者根据索伦森测试TTF被分类为后续LBP发作的高、中或低风险,并进行比较以确定分类是否能区分TE功能差异。研究了索伦森测试TTF与孤立TE表现、人体测量学和残疾之间的相关性。

结果

有后续LBP发作风险的个体比无风险个体有更高的感知残疾和脂肪量/TE力量比(P⩽0.05)。在索伦森测试TTF、TE耐力和脂肪量/TE力量之间发现了适度的显著关联(r = 0.36 - 0.42,P⩽0.05)。探索性分析表明与索伦森测试TTF可能存在性别特异性差异。

结论

孤立的TE肌肉耐力只是对索伦森测试TFF有类似影响的几个因素之一,因此LBP康复策略应考虑其他因素,包括TE力量、人体测量学和感知残疾。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验