Partner at Ropes & Gray LLP.
Director of regulatory affairs at the commercial institutional review board Advarra.
Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Nov;42(6):29-34. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500072.
In response to researcher noncompliance with ethical and regulatory provisions governing research with humans, protocol deviations, and unanticipated problems with research, institutional review boards (IRBs) or institutions sometimes impose restrictions on the use of research data, although specific cases in which this happens are unlikely to be known publicly. We review IRB policies at top research institutions in the United States about restrictions on the use of research data and describe potential reasons for restricting the use of such data in the context of ensuring compliance with human subjects research standards. We also discuss ethical considerations related to restricting the use of research data and argue that IRBs have limited regulatory authority to take such actions. Finally, we offer recommendations regarding decision-making about restricting the use of research data and call for additional guidance in this area.
针对研究人员不遵守涉及人类研究的伦理和法规规定、违反方案以及研究中出现意外问题的情况,机构审查委员会 (IRB) 或机构有时会对研究数据的使用施加限制,尽管这种情况不太可能公开知晓具体案例。我们审查了美国顶尖研究机构的 IRB 政策,了解了有关限制研究数据使用的规定,并描述了在确保符合人体研究标准的情况下限制使用此类数据的潜在原因。我们还讨论了与限制研究数据使用相关的伦理考虑因素,并认为 IRB 对采取此类行动的监管权力有限。最后,我们就限制使用研究数据的决策提出建议,并呼吁在这方面提供更多指导。