• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定价合理:一些国家如何在按服务收费体系中控制支出

Getting The Price Right: How Some Countries Control Spending In A Fee-For-Service System.

作者信息

Gusmano Michael K, Laugesen Miriam, Rodwin Victor G, Brown Lawrence D

机构信息

Michael K. Gusmano (

Miriam Laugesen is an associate professor in the Department of Health Policy and Management in the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, in New York, New York.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1867-1874. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01804.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01804
PMID:33136495
Abstract

Although the US has the highest health care prices in the world, the specific mechanisms commonly used by other countries to set and update prices are often overlooked, with a tendency to favor strategies such as reducing the use of fee-for-service reimbursement. Comparing policies in three high-income countries (France, Germany, and Japan), we describe how payers and physicians engage in structured fee negotiations and standardize prices in systems where fee-for-service is the main model of outpatient physician reimbursement. The parties involved, the frequency of fee schedule updates, and the scope of the negotiations vary, but all three countries attempt to balance the interests of payers with those of physician associations. Instead of looking for policy importation, this analysis demonstrates the benefits of structuring negotiations and standardizing fee-for-service payments independent of any specific reform proposal, such as single-payer reform and public insurance buy-ins.

摘要

尽管美国的医疗保健价格是全球最高的,但其他国家通常用于设定和更新价格的具体机制却常常被忽视,人们倾向于采用诸如减少按服务收费报销方式的使用等策略。通过比较三个高收入国家(法国、德国和日本)的政策,我们描述了在按服务收费是门诊医生报销主要模式的体系中,支付方和医生如何进行结构化的费用谈判并使价格标准化。参与各方、费用表更新的频率以及谈判的范围各不相同,但所有这三个国家都试图平衡支付方与医生协会的利益。该分析并未寻求政策移植,而是展示了独立于任何具体改革提议(如单一支付方改革和公共保险纳入)来构建谈判并使按服务收费支付标准化的益处。

相似文献

1
Getting The Price Right: How Some Countries Control Spending In A Fee-For-Service System.定价合理:一些国家如何在按服务收费体系中控制支出
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1867-1874. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01804.
2
Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Ends at Age 26: Succeeding in an Era of Payment Reform.医疗保险医师费率表在26岁时终止:在支付改革时代取得成功。
J Med Pract Manage. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(4):229-32.
3
Physician payment outlook for 2012: déjà vu.2012 年医生薪酬展望:似曾相识。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):E27-52.
4
Fee-for-service will remain a feature of major payment reforms, requiring more changes in Medicare physician payment.按服务项目付费仍将是主要支付改革的一个特点,这需要对医疗保险医生支付进行更多的改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):1977-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0350.
5
Updating the fee schedule for physician reimbursement: a comparative analysis of France, Germany, Canada, and the United States.更新医生报销费用表:法国、德国、加拿大和美国的比较分析。
Qual Assur Util Rev. 1990 Feb;5(1):16-24. doi: 10.1177/0885713x9000500105.
6
Medicare program; revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2003 and inclusion of registered nurses in the personnel provision of the critical access hospital emergency services requirement for frontier areas and remote locations. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;2003日历年医师费率表下支付政策的修订以及将注册护士纳入边远地区和偏远地区急救医院急诊服务人员配备要求。带有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2002 Dec 31;67(251):79965-80184.
7
Designing fee schedules by formulae, politics, and negotiations.通过公式、政治手段和谈判来设计费用表。
Am J Public Health. 1990 Jul;80(7):804-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.80.7.804.
8
Running Out of Reasons: Low Payments, Hassles Leave Physicians Wondering: Why stay in Medicare?理由殆尽:低报酬、诸多麻烦让医生们不禁思考:为何还要留在医疗保险计划中?
Tex Med. 2020 Jun 1;116(6):34-36.
9
The effect of payment reform on physician practices. Part 1. The shift from fee-for-service to outcomes-based reimbursement.支付改革对医生执业的影响。第1部分。从按服务收费向基于结果的报销的转变。
Mich Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;111(5):14-8.
10
Medicare program; physician fee schedule update for calendar year 1996 and physician volume performance standard rates of increase for federal fiscal year 1996--HCFA. Final notice.医疗保险计划;1996年日历年医生费用表更新及1996财年联邦政府医生工作量绩效标准增长率——医疗保健财务管理局。最终通知。
Fed Regist. 1995 Dec 8;60(236):63358-66.

引用本文的文献

1
Future health expenditures and its determinants in Latin America and the Caribbean: a multi-country projection study.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区未来的医疗支出及其决定因素:一项多国预测研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 May 31;44:100781. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100781. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Why do we need quality measures in emergency medicine?为什么我们在急诊医学中需要质量指标?
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Dec 17;5(6):e13329. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13329. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
CMAJ. 2024 May 26;196(20):E713-E715. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231518-f.
4
Addressing the root causes of the sex-based pay gap in medicine in Canada.解决加拿大医学领域基于性别的薪酬差距的根本原因。
CMAJ. 2024 Apr 1;196(12):E416-E418. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.231518.
5
"Comprehensive Healthcare for America": Using the Insights of Behavioral Economics to Transform the U. S. Healthcare System.《美国全面医保》:利用行为经济学的洞见改革美国医保体系
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):153-171. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.52. Epub 2023 May 25.
6
Healthcare Policy Agenda for a Sustainable Healthcare System in Korea: Building Consensus Using the Delphi Method.韩国可持续医疗体系的医疗政策议程:利用德尔菲法达成共识。
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Oct 10;37(39):e284. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e284.
7
Healthcare Providers' Knowledge of Value-Based Care in Germany: An Adapted, Mixed-Methods Approach.德国医疗服务提供者对基于价值的医疗保健的认知:一种适应性的混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148466.
8
Cancer prevention, risk reduction, and control: opportunities for the next decade of health care delivery research.癌症预防、风险降低和控制:下一个十年医疗保健提供研究的机会。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):1989-1997. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab109.
9
Systematic Literature Review of Capitation and Fee-for-Service Payment Models for Oral Health Services: An Australian Perspective.从澳大利亚视角看口腔健康服务的按人头付费和按服务收费支付模式的系统文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;9(9):1129. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091129.