Department of Oral and Cranio-maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases.
School of Optical-Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology.
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec;31(8):e793-e796. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006751.
The most stable internal fixation pattern for extracapsular condylar fracture (ECF) has been controversial. In this study we aimed to evaluate the stability of 2 common internal fixation patterns using 1 or 2 miniplates separately. One novel measuring method based on the angle of miniplates' localization was introduced.
Twenty-seven patients with 30 sides of extracapsular condylar fracture were enrolled in this retrospective study. All cases were performed open reduction and internal fixation using 1 or 2 titanium plates with both the postoperative immediate CT (T1) and the over 6 months' follow-up CT (T2). Mandibles and implants were segmented and reconstructed respectively using SIMPANT 14.04 software. For 1 miniplate group, the sagittal crossing angle (<1) between miniplate (P1) and posterior border of ipsilateral ramus was measured. For 2 miniplates group, the sagittal crossing angle (<2) between 2 miniplates (P2a, P2b) was measured. Both anteroposterior (∠AP) and mediolateral angle change (∠ML) of each miniplate between T1 and T2 was measured. The stability of 2 internal fixation patterns was measured and evaluated based on the angle change of miniplates. And also the stability of each internal fixation pattern could be investigated based on the relationship between the placement patterns of miniplates and the angle change.
Fifty-two miniplates were finally segmented and reconstructed successfully, including 8 of 1 miniplate group and 44 of 2 miniplate group. For 1 miniplate group, the average ∠AP and ∠ML were 6.10° and 8.54°, respectively. For 2 miniplate group, the average ∠AP and ∠ML of P2a were 3.02° and 2.56°, respectively, as well as 3.12° and 3.07° of P2b.
The novel measuring method based on the angle of miniplates' localization showed potential for the stability evaluation of internal fixation of condylar fracture. In summary, the internal fixation patterns using 2 miniplates shows better stability than that of 1 miniplate.
对于髁突颈外骨折(ECF),最稳定的内固定方式一直存在争议。本研究旨在通过分别使用 1 或 2 块微型板来评估 2 种常见内固定方式的稳定性。引入了一种基于微型板定位角度的新型测量方法。
本回顾性研究纳入了 27 例 30 侧髁突颈外骨折患者。所有病例均采用 1 或 2 块钛板行切开复位内固定术,术后即刻 CT(T1)和超过 6 个月的随访 CT(T2)。使用 SIMPANT 14.04 软件分别对下颌骨和植入物进行分割和重建。对于 1 块微型板组,测量微型板(P1)与同侧升支后缘之间的矢状交叉角(<1)。对于 2 块微型板组,测量 2 块微型板(P2a、P2b)之间的矢状交叉角(<2)。分别测量 T1 至 T2 期间每个微型板的前后角(∠AP)和内外角变化(∠ML)。根据微型板角度变化测量两种内固定方式的稳定性,并根据微型板放置方式与角度变化的关系评估每种内固定方式的稳定性。
最终成功分割和重建了 52 块微型板,其中 1 块微型板组 8 块,2 块微型板组 44 块。对于 1 块微型板组,平均∠AP 和∠ML 分别为 6.10°和 8.54°。对于 2 块微型板组,P2a 的平均∠AP 和∠ML 分别为 3.02°和 2.56°,P2b 的平均∠AP 和∠ML 分别为 3.12°和 3.07°。
基于微型板定位角度的新型测量方法为髁突骨折内固定稳定性评估提供了一种可能。综上所述,使用 2 块微型板的内固定方式比使用 1 块微型板的内固定方式更稳定。