Office of Regulatory Science, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
Office of Applied Research and Safety Assessment, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
BMC Microbiol. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-02004-1.
An effective environmental sampling method involves the use of a transport/neutralizing broth with the ability to neutralize sanitizer residues that are collected during sampling and to maintain viability of stressed Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) cells.
We applied Lm onto stainless steel surfaces and then subjected Lm to desiccation stress for 16-18 h at room temperature (RT, 21-24 °C). This was followed by the subsequent application of Whisper™ V, a quaternary ammonium compound (QAC)-based sanitizer, diluted to 400 ppm and 8000 ppm of active quat, for 6 h. We then sampled Lm with sponges pre-moistened in three transport broths, Dey/Engley (D/E) broth, Letheen broth and HiCap™ broth, to generate environmental samples that contained sanitizer residues and low levels of stressed Lm, which were subsequently analyzed by an enrichment-based method. This scheme conformed with validation guidelines of AOAC International by using 20 environmental test portions per broth that contained low levels of Lm such that not all test portions were positive (i.e., fractional positive). We showed that D/E broth, Letheen broth and HiCap™ broth performed similarly when no quat or 400 ppm of quat was applied to the Lm contaminating stainless steel surfaces. However, when 8000 ppm of quat was applied, Letheen broth did not effectively neutralize the QAC in the samples. These comparisons were performed on samples stored under three conditions after collection to replicate scenarios of sample transport, RT for 2 h, 4 °C for 24 h and 4 °C for 72 h. Comparisons under the three different scenarios generally reached the same conclusions. In addition, we further demonstrated that storing Letheen and HiCap™ broths at RT for two months before sampling did not reduce their capacity to neutralize sanitizers.
We developed a scheme to evaluate the ability of transport broths to neutralize QAC sanitizers. The three transport broths performed similarly with a commonly used concentration of quat, but Letheen broth could not effectively neutralize a very high concentration of QAC. The performance of transport broths was not significantly affected under the assessed pre-sampling and post-sampling storage conditions.
有效的环境采样方法涉及使用具有中和能力的运输/中和肉汤,该肉汤能够中和采样过程中收集的消毒剂残留,并保持压力应激李斯特菌 (Lm) 细胞的活力。
我们将 Lm 接种到不锈钢表面,然后在室温(RT,21-24°C)下使 Lm 干燥应激 16-18 小时。随后,将一种季铵化合物 (QAC) 为基础的消毒剂 Whisper™ V 稀释至 400ppm 和 8000ppm 的有效季铵盐,作用 6 小时。然后,我们用预先润湿在三种运输肉汤中的海绵采集 Lm 样本,这三种肉汤分别为 Dey/Engley(D/E)肉汤、Letheen 肉汤和 HiCap™ 肉汤,以生成含有消毒剂残留和低水平压力应激 Lm 的环境样本,随后通过基于富集的方法进行分析。该方案符合 AOAC International 的验证指南,使用每瓶含有低水平 Lm 的 20 个环境测试部分,使得并非所有测试部分均为阳性(即分数阳性)。我们表明,当未将季铵盐或 400ppm 的季铵盐应用于污染不锈钢表面的 Lm 时,D/E 肉汤、Letheen 肉汤和 HiCap™ 肉汤的性能相似。然而,当应用 8000ppm 的季铵盐时,Letheen 肉汤不能有效地中和样品中的 QAC。这些比较是在收集后在三种条件下进行的,以复制样本运输、RT 下 2 小时、4°C 下 24 小时和 4°C 下 72 小时的样本。在三种不同情况下的比较通常得出相同的结论。此外,我们进一步证明,在采样前将 Letheen 和 HiCap™ 肉汤在 RT 下储存两个月不会降低它们中和消毒剂的能力。
我们开发了一种评估运输肉汤中和季铵消毒剂能力的方案。三种运输肉汤在常用季铵盐浓度下表现相似,但 Letheen 肉汤不能有效中和非常高浓度的 QAC。在评估的采样前和采样后储存条件下,运输肉汤的性能没有受到显著影响。