Rutgers University School of Public Health and The Hastings Center, 683 Hoes Lane West, Room 311, Piscataway Township, NJ08854.
Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2021 Jul;16(3):251-255. doi: 10.1017/S1744133120000389. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
Before his incoherent response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the focus of President Trump's health policy agenda was the elimination of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he has called a 'disaster'. The attacks on the ACA included proposals to repeal the law through the legislative process, to erode it through a series of executive actions, and to ask the courts to declare it unconstitutional. Despite these ongoing challenges, the ACA remains largely intact as the U.S. heads into the 2020 election. The longer term fate of the law, however, is uncertain and the outcome of the 2020 election is likely to have a dramatic effect on the direction of health policy in the U.S.
在特朗普总统对 COVID-19 大流行做出语无伦次的回应之前,他的健康政策议程的重点是消除《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA),他称之为“灾难”。对 ACA 的攻击包括通过立法程序废除该法律、通过一系列行政行动削弱该法律,以及要求法院宣布该法律违宪。尽管面临这些持续的挑战,ACA 在进入 2020 年选举时仍然基本保持完整。然而,该法律的长期命运尚不确定,2020 年选举的结果可能会对美国的卫生政策方向产生巨大影响。