Nuffield Department of Population Health, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK.
Bliss, Maya House, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 May;106(3):244-250. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319545. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
More effective recruitment strategies like alternative approaches to consent are needed to facilitate adequately powered trials. Witholding Enteral feeds Around Transfusion was a multicentre, randomised, pilot trial that compared withholding and continuing feeds around transfusion. The primary clinical outcome was necrotising enterocolitis. The trial used simplified opt-out consent with concise parent information and no consent form.
To explore the views and experiences of parents and health professionals on the acceptability and feasibility of opt-out consent in randomised comparative effectiveness trials.
A qualitative, descriptive interview-based study nested within a randomised trial. Semistructured interview transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
Eleven neonatal units in England.
Eleven parents and ten health professionals with experience of simplified consent.
Five themes emerged: 'opt-out consent operationalised as verbal opt-in consent', 'opt-out consent normalises participation while preserving parental choice', 'opt-out consent as an ongoing process of informed choice', 'consent without a consent form' and 'choosing to opt out of a comparative effectiveness trial', with two subthemes: 'wanting "normal care"' and 'a belief that feeding is better'.
Introducing a novel form of consent proved challenging in practice. The principle of a simplified, opt-out approach to consent was generally considered feasible and acceptable by health professionals for a neonatal comparative effectiveness trial. The priority for parents was having the right to decide about trial participation, and they did not see opt-out consent as undermining this. Describing a study as 'opt-out' can help to normalise participation and emphasise that parents can withdraw consent.
需要更有效的招募策略,如替代同意方法,以促进有足够效力的试验。在输血时暂停肠内喂养是一项多中心、随机、试点试验,比较了在输血时暂停和继续喂养。主要临床结局是坏死性小肠结肠炎。该试验使用简化的选择退出同意,包括简明的家长信息,无需同意书。
探讨父母和卫生专业人员对随机对照效果试验中选择退出同意的可接受性和可行性的看法和经验。
在一项随机试验中嵌套的定性、描述性访谈研究。使用归纳主题分析对半结构化访谈记录进行分析。
英国 11 个新生儿病房。
11 名父母和 10 名有简化同意经验的卫生专业人员。
出现了五个主题:“选择退出同意操作化为口头选择加入同意”、“选择退出同意在保留父母选择权的同时使参与正常化”、“选择退出同意作为知情选择的持续过程”、“没有同意书的同意”和“选择退出比较效果试验”,并有两个子主题:“想要‘常规护理’”和“相信喂养更好”。
在实践中,引入一种新的同意形式被证明具有挑战性。对于新生儿比较效果试验,卫生专业人员普遍认为简化的选择退出同意方法的原则是可行且可接受的。父母的首要任务是有权决定是否参与试验,他们不认为选择退出同意会损害这一点。将一项研究描述为“选择退出”可以帮助使参与正常化,并强调父母可以撤回同意。