• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

最佳注视方向对慢性颈痛患者深层颈屈肌激活的重要性。

The Importance of Optimal Gaze Direction on Deep Neck Flexor Activation in Chronic Neck Pain.

作者信息

Lee Byoung-Kwon, Seo Dong-Kwon

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Konyang University, Daejeon 35365, Korea.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):449. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040449.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare8040449
PMID:33139645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7712906/
Abstract

Chronic neck pain (CNP) patients have weak deep neck flexors (DNF) and a hyperactive sternocleidomastoid (SCM). The cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT) promotes activation of the DNF and decreases activity of the SCM, promoting pain recovery, but research suggests SCM activation increases with increasing gaze direction. We aimed to investigate how DNF and SCM activation varies according to gaze direction in the CCFT, and to prescribe the appropriate gaze direction for CNP. Twenty-eight CNP subjects had their maximum strength pressure level determined by CCFT for strength (20-~30 mmHg) and at each of the measured pressures, DNF and SCM thickness in each of four gaze directions (0°, 20°, 40°, and 60°) was measured by ultrasound imaging. The DNF to SCM ratio varied significantly according to gaze direction ( < 0.05), with gaze directions of 20° and 0° being significantly different from 40° ( < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in DNF activation according to gaze direction, there was in SCM activation ( < 0.05), with SCM 60° significantly different from SCM 20° and SCM 40° ( < 0.05). In order to increase DNF activation efficiency during the CCFT, SCM activation should be controlled, and a gaze direction below 20° is the most efficient. This can inform DNF training of CNP patients in a clinical environment.

摘要

慢性颈痛(CNP)患者的颈深屈肌(DNF)较弱,胸锁乳突肌(SCM)过度活跃。颅颈屈曲试验(CCFT)可促进DNF的激活并降低SCM的活动,从而促进疼痛恢复,但研究表明,随着注视方向的增加,SCM的激活会增加。我们旨在研究在CCFT中DNF和SCM的激活如何随注视方向而变化,并为CNP患者规定合适的注视方向。28名CNP受试者通过CCFT确定其最大力量压力水平(20~30 mmHg),并在每个测量压力下,通过超声成像测量四个注视方向(0°、20°、40°和60°)下的DNF和SCM厚度。DNF与SCM的比值根据注视方向有显著差异(<0.05),20°和0°的注视方向与40°有显著差异(<0.05)。尽管根据注视方向,DNF激活没有显著差异,但SCM激活有显著差异(<0.05),SCM 60°与SCM 20°和SCM 40°有显著差异(<0.05)。为了在CCFT期间提高DNF激活效率,应控制SCM激活,20°以下的注视方向最有效。这可为临床环境中CNP患者的DNF训练提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/066491cc065c/healthcare-08-00449-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/2806980c4c92/healthcare-08-00449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/97ba2ed2205b/healthcare-08-00449-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/066491cc065c/healthcare-08-00449-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/2806980c4c92/healthcare-08-00449-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/97ba2ed2205b/healthcare-08-00449-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f21/7712906/066491cc065c/healthcare-08-00449-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Importance of Optimal Gaze Direction on Deep Neck Flexor Activation in Chronic Neck Pain.最佳注视方向对慢性颈痛患者深层颈屈肌激活的重要性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 1;8(4):449. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040449.
2
Can a functional postural exercise improve performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test?--a preliminary study.功能性姿势训练能否提高颅颈屈曲试验的表现?——一项初步研究。
Man Ther. 2012 Jun;17(3):219-24. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.12.005. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
3
The effect of therapeutic exercise on activation of the deep cervical flexor muscles in people with chronic neck pain.治疗性运动对慢性颈痛患者颈深屈肌激活的影响。
Man Ther. 2009 Dec;14(6):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
4
Ultrasonographic measurement of neck muscle recruitment: a preliminary investigation.颈部肌肉募集的超声测量:一项初步研究。
J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):89-92. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818486.
5
McKenzie neck exercise versus cranio-cervical flexion exercise on strength and endurance of deep neck flexor muscles, pain, disability, and craniovertebral angle in individuals with chronic neck pain: a randomized clinical trial.麦肯基颈部运动与头颈部屈曲运动对慢性颈痛患者深层颈屈肌力量和耐力、疼痛、残疾和颅椎角的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Man Manip Ther. 2024 Dec;32(6):573-583. doi: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2337979. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
6
An endurance-strength training regime is effective in reducing myoelectric manifestations of cervical flexor muscle fatigue in females with chronic neck pain.耐力-力量训练方案对于减轻患有慢性颈部疼痛的女性颈屈肌疲劳的肌电表现是有效的。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):828-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.025. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
7
Performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test is altered in elderly subjects.老年受试者颅颈屈曲试验的表现有所改变。
Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):475-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.12.003. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
8
Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test.颈深屈肌的临床评估:颅颈屈曲试验
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.003.
9
Women with mechanical neck pain exhibit increased activation of their superficial neck extensors when performing the cranio-cervical flexion test.患有机械性颈痛的女性在进行颅颈屈伸试验时,其浅层颈伸肌的活动度增加。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2020 Oct;49:102222. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102222. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
DEEP NECK FLEXORS IMPACT RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE ACTIVITY DURING ACTIVE STRAIGHT LEG RAISING.深层颈屈肌对主动直腿抬高时腹直肌活动的影响。
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Dec;15(6):1044-1051. doi: 10.26603/ijspt20201044.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of deep cervical flexor training on impaired physiological functions associated with chronic neck pain: a systematic review.深层颈屈肌训练对慢性颈部疼痛相关生理功能受损的影响:一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Nov 28;19(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2324-z.
2
An ultrasonographic investigation of deep neck flexor muscles cross-sectional area in forward and normal head posture.一项关于头前伸姿势和正常头姿势下颈部深层屈肌横截面积的超声检查。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Jul;22(3):643-647. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
3
Atlantoaxial Instability in a Patient with Neck Pain and Ankylosing Spondylitis.
一名患有颈部疼痛和强直性脊柱炎患者的寰枢椎不稳
Mil Med. 2018 Sep 1;183(9-10):e654-e657. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy034.
4
What is a more effective method of cranio-cervical flexion exercises?更有效的颅颈屈曲练习方法是什么?
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):415-423. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170860.
5
Are Ultrasonographic Measures of Cervical Flexor Muscles Correlated With Flexion Endurance in Chronic Neck Pain and Asymptomatic Participants?慢性颈部疼痛患者和无症状参与者的颈椎屈肌超声测量值与屈曲耐力相关吗?
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Dec;96(12):874-880. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000778.
6
Comparison of cervical muscle thickness between asymptomatic women with and without forward head posture.比较有无伸头姿势的无症状女性的颈肌厚度。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 May-Jun;21(3):206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Deep Neck Flexor Endurance in the Adolescent and Young Adult: Normative Data and Associated Attributes.青少年和青年成人的深层颈部屈肌耐力:规范数据及相关属性
PM R. 2017 Oct;9(10):969-975. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
The clinical and EMG assessment of the effects of stabilization exercise on nonspecific chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.稳定化训练对非特异性慢性颈部疼痛影响的临床及肌电图评估:一项随机对照试验。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(2):211-219. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160735.
9
Neck Flexor and Extensor Muscle Endurance in Subclinical Neck Pain: Intrarater Reliability, Standard Error of Measurement, Minimal Detectable Change, and Comparison With Asymptomatic Participants in a University Student Population.亚临床颈部疼痛患者颈部屈肌和伸肌耐力:评分者内信度、测量标准误差、最小可检测变化以及与大学生无症状参与者的比较
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Jul-Aug;39(6):427-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Correlation between deep cervical flexor muscle thickness at rest and sternocleidomastoid activity during the craniocervical flexion test.静息时颈深屈肌厚度与颅颈屈曲试验期间胸锁乳突肌活动之间的相关性。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016 Jan;20(1):208-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 16.