• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

phactMI™ 基准调查:对 27 个医疗信息部门回应医疗保健决策者查询的分析。

phactMI™ Benchmarking Survey: Analysis of 27 Medical Information Departments Responses to Inquiries from Health Care Decision Makers.

机构信息

Y-mAbs Therapeutics, Inc, New York, NY, USA.

Sanofi, 55 Corporate Drive, Bridgewater Township, NJ, 08807, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1291-1295. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00148-w. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-020-00148-w
PMID:33140259
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The nature in which health care insurance companies have interacted with drug manufacturers has evolved over the last 50 years, demanding shifts in how the pharmaceutical industry responds. The purpose of this article is to highlight how medical groups within Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information (phactMI™) member companies respond to requests from health care decision makers (HCDMs) and to understand the similarities and differences among drug manufacturers (DMs) in this evolving climate of information exchange.

METHODS

As health care insurance companies transition towards a managed care model and began assessments of both the clinical and economical aspects of drug products, DMs began to respond to requests from HCDMs. An anonymous 16-question survey was conducted to evaluate how 27 Medical Information departments (MIDs) respond to payer requests for information, and to identify payer needs in order to provide a better overall customer experience.

RESULTS

The results from this survey provided insight into the overall management of payer unsolicited medical requests (PUMRs) and focused on a few different areas, including how requests are received, what materials are requested and which are sent, online availability, and availability of materials for products in the pipeline.

CONCLUSION

Further discussion is recommended to ensure a focused approach in developing tools and identifying appropriate resources are available to address inquiries from HCDMs.

摘要

背景

在过去的 50 年里,医疗保险公司与制药商的互动方式发生了变化,这要求制药行业做出相应的转变。本文的目的是强调 Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information(phactMI™)成员公司内的医疗团体如何响应医疗保健决策者(HCDM)的请求,并了解在信息交流的这种不断变化的环境中,制药商(DM)之间的相似点和不同点。

方法

随着医疗保险公司向管理式医疗模式转变,并开始评估药品的临床和经济方面,DM 开始响应 HCDM 的请求。进行了一项匿名的 16 个问题的调查,以评估 27 个医学信息部门(MID)如何响应付费者的信息请求,并确定付费者的需求,以提供更好的整体客户体验。

结果

这项调查的结果深入了解了付费者主动医疗请求(PUMR)的整体管理情况,并重点关注了几个不同的领域,包括如何接收请求、请求的材料以及发送的材料、在线可用性以及正在研发产品的材料可用性。

结论

建议进一步讨论,以确保在开发工具和确定可用的适当资源方面采取有针对性的方法,以满足 HCDM 的查询。

相似文献

1
phactMI™ Benchmarking Survey: Analysis of 27 Medical Information Departments Responses to Inquiries from Health Care Decision Makers.phactMI™ 基准调查:对 27 个医疗信息部门回应医疗保健决策者查询的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1291-1295. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00148-w. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
2
phactMI Benchmarking Survey on Content Development and Inquiry Management.phactMI 内容开发和查询管理基准测试调查。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1263-1268. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00137-z. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information (phactMI™) Benchmark Study: Results of Organizational Structure and Resourcing of Medical Information Services in Support of Building Departmental Strategies.制药行业透明医学信息合作(phactMI™)基准研究:支持部门战略制定的医学信息服务组织结构和资源配置的结果。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1269-1274. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00143-1. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
4
Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information (phactMI™) Benchmark Study: Trends, Drivers, and Value of Product Support Activities, Key Performance Indicators, and Other Medical Information Services: Insights from a Survey of 27 US Pharmaceutical Medical Information Departments.制药行业透明医疗信息合作(phactMI™)基准研究:产品支持活动、关键绩效指标和其他医疗信息服务的趋势、驱动因素和价值:来自对 27 家美国制药医疗信息部门调查的见解。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1275-1281. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00162-y. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
An Update from the Benchmark Survey of phactMI™ Member Companies on Providing Medical Information in the Digital Space.phactMI™ 会员公司在数字空间提供医学信息的基准调查更新。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):200-213. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00587-1. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
6
Where are We Now in Providing Medical Information in the Digital Space? A Benchmark Survey of PhactMI™ Member Companies.我们现在在数字空间提供医疗信息方面处于什么位置?PhactMI™成员公司的基准调查。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1282-1290. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00222-3. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
7
Responding to Unsolicited Medical Requests from Health Care Professionals on Pharmaceutical Industry-Owned Social Media Sites: Three Pilot Studies.回应医疗保健专业人员在制药行业自有社交媒体网站上主动提出的医疗请求:三项试点研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 29;20(10):e285. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9643.
8
Best practices in designing preapproval information engagements for US health care decision makers.设计美国医疗保健决策者预审批信息参与的最佳实践。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):245-250. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.245.
9
Pharma Collaboration for Transparent Medical Information (phactMI) Benchmark Study: Trends, Drivers, Success Factors, and Value of Globalization in Medical Information.透明医疗信息制药合作组织(phactMI)基准研究:医疗信息全球化的趋势、驱动因素、成功因素及价值
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 May;53(3):332-339. doi: 10.1177/2168479018779920. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
10
Health care decision-maker perceptions and trends in the utilization of preapproval information for formulary decision-making.医疗保健决策者对用于处方集决策的预先批准信息的认知及利用趋势。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 May;30(5):475-479. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.5.475.