Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.
Cardiol J. 2022;29(5):807-814. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0147. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
The current study sought to assess the impact of the intraprocedural heart rhythm (sinus rhythm [SR] vs. atrial fibrillation [AF]) on acute procedural characteristics, durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and long-term clinical outcomes of cryoballoon (CB) ablation.
A total of 195 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 136) or persistent AF (n = 59) underwent CB-based PVI. Ablation procedures were either performed in SR (SR group; n = 147) or during AF (AF group; n = 48). Persistent AF was more frequent in the AF group than in the SR group (62% vs. 20%). All other patient baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups.
The nadir temperature during the CB applications was significantly lower in the AF group than in patients in the SR group (-49 [interquartile range, -44; -54]°C vs. -47 [-42; -52]°C, p = 0.002). Median procedure and fluoroscopy times as well as the rate of real-time recordings were not different between the two groups. Repeat ablation for the treatment of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was performed in 60 patients (SR: 44 [30%] patients; AF: 16 [33%] patients), with a trend towards a lower rate of pulmonary vein reconnections in the AF group (p = 0.07). There was no difference in 3-year arrhythmia-free survival (p = 0.8).
Cryoballoon-based PVI during AF results in lower nadir balloon temperatures and a trend towards a higher durability of PVI as compared to procedures performed in SR. The rate of real-time PVI recordings was not affected by the intraprocedural heart rhythm.
本研究旨在评估术中节律(窦性节律[SR]与心房颤动[AF])对冷冻球囊(CB)消融的急性程序特征、肺静脉隔离(PVI)的耐久性和长期临床结果的影响。
共 195 例有症状阵发性(n=136)或持续性 AF(n=59)的患者接受 CB 为基础的 PVI。消融程序在 SR 中进行(SR 组;n=147)或在 AF 中进行(AF 组;n=48)。AF 组持续性 AF 比 SR 组更常见(62% vs. 20%)。两组间其他患者基线特征无差异。
AF 组的 CB 应用时最低温度明显低于 SR 组(-49 [四分位距,-44;-54]℃ vs. -47 [-42;-52]℃,p=0.002)。两组间程序和透视时间中位数以及实时记录率无差异。60 例患者(SR:44 [30%]例;AF:16 [33%]例)因心房心律失常复发进行重复消融治疗,AF 组肺静脉再连接率有降低趋势(p=0.07)。3 年无心律失常生存率无差异(p=0.8)。
与 SR 相比,AF 期间的 CB 为基础的 PVI 可导致更低的球囊最低温度和更高的 PVI 耐久性。实时 PVI 记录率不受术中节律的影响。