Solbakk Jan Helge, Bentzen Heidi Beate, Holm Søren, Heggestad Anne Kari Tolo, Hofmann Bjørn, Robertsen Annette, Alnæs Anne Hambro, Cox Shereen, Pedersen Reidar, Bernabe Rose
Faculty of Medicine, Center for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, Box 1130, 0318, Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Law, Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Mar;24(1):3-20. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09984-x. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
The Covid-19 pandemic creates an unprecedented threatening situation worldwide with an urgent need for critical reflection and new knowledge production, but also a need for imminent action despite prevailing knowledge gaps and multilevel uncertainty. With regard to the role of research ethics in these pandemic times some argue in favor of exceptionalism, others, including the authors of this paper, emphasize the urgent need to remain committed to core ethical principles and fundamental human rights obligations all reflected in research regulations and guidelines carefully crafted over time. In this paper we disentangle some of the arguments put forward in the ongoing debate about Covid-19 human challenge studies (CHIs) and the concomitant role of health-related research ethics in pandemic times. We suggest it might be helpful to think through a lens differentiating between risk, strict uncertainty and ignorance. We provide some examples of lessons learned by harm done in the name of research in the past and discuss the relevance of this legacy in the current situation.
新冠疫情在全球造成了前所未有的威胁局面,迫切需要进行批判性反思和新知识生产,同时尽管存在普遍的知识空白和多层次的不确定性,也需要立即采取行动。关于研究伦理在这些疫情时期的作用,一些人主张采取特殊主义,而包括本文作者在内的其他人则强调迫切需要继续致力于核心伦理原则和基本人权义务,这些都体现在经过长期精心制定的研究法规和指南中。在本文中,我们梳理了关于新冠病毒人体挑战研究(CHIs)的 ongoing 辩论中提出的一些论点,以及健康相关研究伦理在疫情时期的伴随作用。我们建议,通过区分风险、严格不确定性和无知的视角来思考可能会有所帮助。我们提供了一些过去以研究之名造成伤害的经验教训的例子,并讨论了这一 legacy 在当前形势下的相关性。