• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19.故意感染 COVID-19 志愿者的伦理准则。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):502-504. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106322. Epub 2020 May 27.
2
Dozens to be deliberately infected with coronavirus in UK 'human challenge' trials.在英国的“人体挑战”试验中,数十人将被故意感染新冠病毒。
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):651-652. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02821-4.
3
Covid-19 vaccines: Should we allow human challenge studies to infect healthy volunteers with SARS-CoV-2?新冠疫苗:我们应该允许人体挑战研究让健康志愿者感染新冠病毒吗?
BMJ. 2020 Nov 9;371:m4258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4258.
4
COVID-19 vaccine development: Time to consider SARS-CoV-2 challenge studies?COVID-19 疫苗开发:是时候考虑 SARS-CoV-2 挑战研究了吗?
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 14;38(33):5085-5088. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
5
COVID-19 and Moral Imperialism in Multinational Clinical Research.新冠疫情与跨国临床研究中的道德帝国主义。
Arch Med Res. 2020 Aug;51(6):572-573. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.04.017. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
6
Covid-19: Human challenge studies will see people purposefully infected with virus.新冠疫情:人体挑战试验将让人们故意感染病毒。
BMJ. 2020 Oct 22;371:m4101. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4101.
7
The Impact of COVID-19 on the Conduct of Clinical Trials for Medical Products in Korea.新冠疫情对韩国医疗产品临床试验开展的影响。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Sep 14;35(36):e329. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e329.
8
Ethical Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials in Correctional Facilities.惩教设施中新冠疫苗试验的伦理考量
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1031-1032. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.15589.
9
Talk to Patients About: Why Will It Take So Long for a COVID-19 Vaccine?与患者谈论:为什么新冠疫苗需要这么长时间?
Tex Med. 2020 Jun 1;116(6):19.
10
Covid-19 Vaccine Trials and Incarcerated People - The Ethics of Inclusion.新冠疫苗试验与被监禁者——纳入的伦理问题
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1897-1899. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2025955. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of ethics review processes during public health emergencies in Africa.非洲突发公共卫生事件中的伦理审查流程的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 May 22;25(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01054-8.
2
Ethics Committees: Structure, Roles, and Issues.伦理委员会:结构、角色和问题。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jun 26;38(25):e198. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e198.
3
Adaptive treatment allocation and selection in multi-arm clinical trials: a Bayesian perspective.多臂临床试验中的适应性治疗分配和选择:贝叶斯视角。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 20;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01526-8.
4
Challenges to COVID-19 vaccine supply chain: Implications for sustainable development goals.新冠疫苗供应链面临的挑战:对可持续发展目标的影响
Int J Prod Econ. 2021 Sep;239:108193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108193. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
5
Broad cross-national public support for accelerated COVID-19 vaccine trial designs.广泛的跨国公众支持加速 COVID-19 疫苗试验设计。
Vaccine. 2021 Jan 8;39(2):309-316. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.072. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Vaccines for COVID-19.COVID-19 疫苗。
Clin Exp Immunol. 2020 Nov;202(2):162-192. doi: 10.1111/cei.13517. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
7
Why continuing uncertainties are no reason to postpone challenge trials for coronavirus vaccines.为什么持续存在的不确定性不是推迟冠状病毒疫苗挑战试验的理由。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):808-812. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106501. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
8
AIDS Activism and Coronavirus Vaccine Challenge Trials.艾滋病维权运动与新冠病毒疫苗挑战试验
AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3302-3305. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02953-8.
9
COVID-19 Vaccines: "Warp Speed" Needs Mind Melds, Not Warped Minds.COVID-19 疫苗:“超速”需要心灵融合,而不是扭曲的思维。
J Virol. 2020 Aug 17;94(17). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01083-20.

本文引用的文献

1
Human Challenge Studies to Accelerate Coronavirus Vaccine Licensure.人类挑战研究加速冠状病毒疫苗许可。
J Infect Dis. 2020 May 11;221(11):1752-1756. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa152.
2
Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of COVID-19: a modelling study.非洲国家防范 COVID-19 输入的准备情况和脆弱性:建模研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):871-877. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30411-6. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.研究性药物的临床开发成功率。
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2786.
4
Fatal trials: clinical trials are killing people.致命的试验:临床试验正在致人死亡。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul-Sep;6(3):118-9. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2009.041.
5
The ethical challenge of infection-inducing challenge experiments.感染诱导挑战实验的伦理挑战。
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Oct 1;33(7):1028-33. doi: 10.1086/322664. Epub 2001 Sep 5.

故意感染 COVID-19 志愿者的伦理准则。

Ethical guidelines for deliberately infecting volunteers with COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):502-504. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106322. Epub 2020 May 27.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2020-106322
PMID:32461245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7316118/
Abstract

Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods-that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.

摘要

预计 2020-2021 年全球因 COVID-19 而死亡的人数将会很高。开发和提供疫苗可能是结束大流行的最有效途径。如果能够将这一开发时间缩短数周或数月,这可能会对减少死亡人数产生重大影响。如果在第二阶段和第三阶段试验中使用人体挑战方法,即在接种后故意使参与者感染 COVID-19,那么试验的进行时间可能会更短。本文分析了赞成和反对这些方法的论点,并为监管机构、研究人员和伦理委员会在考虑这些问题时提供了广泛的建议性指导方针。结论是,在延迟至关重要的情况下,可能有可能在保持当前伦理标准的同时,仍然允许进行人体挑战试验。这意味着监管机构和研究人员现在需要共同努力,设计出强大但简短的试验,并简化伦理审批程序,以便在提出试验申请时做好准备。