Department of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):502-504. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106322. Epub 2020 May 27.
Global fatalities related to COVID-19 are expected to be high in 2020-2021. Developing and delivering a vaccine may be the most likely way to end the pandemic. If it were possible to shorten this development time by weeks or months, this may have a significant effect on reducing deaths. Phase II and phase III trials could take less long to conduct if they used human challenge methods-that is, deliberately infecting participants with COVID-19 following inoculation. This article analyses arguments for and against such methods and provides suggested broad guidelines for regulators, researchers and ethics committees when considering these matters. It concludes that it may be possible to maintain current ethical standards yet still permit human challenge trials in a context where delay is critical. The implications are that regulators and researchers need to work together now to design robust but short trials and streamline ethics approval processes so that they are in place when applications for trials are made.
预计 2020-2021 年全球因 COVID-19 而死亡的人数将会很高。开发和提供疫苗可能是结束大流行的最有效途径。如果能够将这一开发时间缩短数周或数月,这可能会对减少死亡人数产生重大影响。如果在第二阶段和第三阶段试验中使用人体挑战方法,即在接种后故意使参与者感染 COVID-19,那么试验的进行时间可能会更短。本文分析了赞成和反对这些方法的论点,并为监管机构、研究人员和伦理委员会在考虑这些问题时提供了广泛的建议性指导方针。结论是,在延迟至关重要的情况下,可能有可能在保持当前伦理标准的同时,仍然允许进行人体挑战试验。这意味着监管机构和研究人员现在需要共同努力,设计出强大但简短的试验,并简化伦理审批程序,以便在提出试验申请时做好准备。