Suppr超能文献

评估德国一家三级保健中心特定机构的抗菌药物指南对医生处方行为的影响,以及提供移动应用程序的额外益处。

Assessing the impact of institution-specific guidelines for antimicrobials on doctors' prescribing behavior at a German tertiary-care center and the additional benefits of providing a mobile application.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine II, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

Institute for Medical Microbiology and Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241642. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess usage patterns, perceived usability, and effects of institution-specific guidelines (ISGs) for antimicrobials on clinicians' prescribing behavior and the additional benefits of the mobile application (app), a single-center survey among medical doctors was performed.

METHODS

The study was carried out in a 1451-bed tertiary-care academic medical center in Leipzig, Germany. To ensure optimal empirical antibiotic therapies, appropriate diagnostics, and targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis, ISGs were provided as printed pocket guides (since 2014), a PDF version on ward computers, and a mobile app (since 2017). For the survey, we used an electronically structured cross-sectional questionnaire with 31 items, ordinal Likert scales, and percent bars, allowing for quantitative comparisons.

RESULTS

Of the 914 doctors contacted by email, 282 (31%) responded, and 254 (28%) surveys were eligible. ISGs were reported to be the most commonly used source of information for antimicrobial prescribing among the respondents. Ninety-four percent used ISGs at least once and 55% at least weekly. On average, participants reported using them in 38% of antibiotic prescriptions and to adhere to consulted recommendations in 87% of cases. Young clinicians (≤ 30 years) reported significantly higher use of the ISGs than their older colleagues (47% vs. 35% of antibiotic prescriptions, p = 0.004). Ninety-six percent of users found ISGs to be user-friendly, and nearly 100% recommended ISGs to other colleagues. Forty-five percent regarded the app as the most user-friendly way to access ISGs, and app users were significantly more likely to use ISGs regularly (p = 0.024). Eighty-four percent reported behavioral changes regarding at least one aspect of antimicrobial therapy (e.g. duration, application mode, prescription frequency), while 54% reported changes regarding the choice of specific substance groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ISGs are used regularly and appear to have a relevant impact on clinicians' prescribing habits. A mobile app may be the most effective way to provide ISGs, although multiple platforms seem to add value. While the majority of participants reported perceived effects on their prescribing behavior, this study does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about the extent of the effects of ISGs on antibiotic use and patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估特定机构指南(ISG)对抗菌药物使用模式、感知可用性的影响,以及移动应用程序(app)的额外益处,在德国莱比锡的一家 1451 张床位的三级保健学术医疗中心进行了一项针对医生的单中心调查。

方法

该研究在德国莱比锡的一家 1451 张床位的三级保健学术医疗中心进行。为了确保最佳的经验性抗生素治疗、适当的诊断和有针对性的抗菌预防,自 2014 年以来,ISG 以印刷袖珍指南、病房电脑上的 PDF 版本和移动应用程序(自 2017 年以来)的形式提供。为了进行调查,我们使用了一份包含 31 个项目的电子结构的横断面问卷,采用了有序李克特量表和百分比条,允许进行定量比较。

结果

在通过电子邮件联系的 914 名医生中,有 282 名(31%)做出了回应,有 254 名(28%)调查符合条件。报告称,ISG 是受访者中抗菌药物处方最常用的信息来源。94%的人至少使用过一次 ISG,55%的人至少每周使用一次。平均而言,参与者报告在 38%的抗生素处方中使用 ISG,并在 87%的情况下遵守咨询建议。年轻医生(≤30 岁)比年长同事(47%与 35%的抗生素处方,p=0.004)更频繁地使用 ISG。96%的使用者认为 ISG 易于使用,几乎 100%的人向其他同事推荐 ISG。45%的人认为应用程序是访问 ISG 最方便的方式,而应用程序用户更有可能定期使用 ISG(p=0.024)。84%的人报告说,抗菌治疗的至少一个方面(如持续时间、应用模式、处方频率)的行为发生了变化,而 54%的人报告说,特定药物组的选择发生了变化。

结论

ISG 经常被使用,并似乎对医生的处方习惯产生了相关影响。移动应用程序可能是提供 ISG 的最有效方式,尽管多个平台似乎都增加了价值。虽然大多数参与者报告了对其处方行为的感知影响,但本研究无法得出关于 ISG 对抗生素使用和患者结果影响程度的任何结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89d7/7608892/7dbcd489f932/pone.0241642.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验