Panesar Preet, Jones Alisdair, Aldous Alicia, Kranzer Katharina, Halpin Eamus, Fifer Helen, Macrae Bruce, Curtis Carmel, Pollara Gabriele
Department of Pharmacy, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 25;11(4):e0154202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154202. eCollection 2016.
Our hospital replaced the format for delivering portable antimicrobial prescribing guidance from a paper-based pocket guide to a smartphone application (app). We used this opportunity to assess the relationship between its use and the attitudes and behaviours of antimicrobial prescribers.
We used 2 structured cross-sectional questionnaires issued just prior to and 3 months following the launch of the smartphone app. Ordinal Likert scale responses to both frequencies of use and agreement statements permitted quantitative assessment of the relationship between variables.
The smartphone app was used more frequently than the pocket guide it replaced (p < 0.01), and its increased use was associated with sentiments that the app was useful, easy to navigate and its content relevant. Users who used the app more frequently were more likely to agree that the app encouraged them to challenge inappropriate prescribing by their colleagues (p = 0.001) and were more aware of the importance of antimicrobial stewardship (p = 0.005). Reduced use of the app was associated with agreement that senior physicians' preferences for antimicrobial prescribing would irrespectively overrule guideline recommendations (p = 0.0002).
Smartphone apps are an effective and acceptable format to deliver guidance on antimicrobial prescribing. Our findings suggest that they may empower users to challenge incorrect prescribing, breaking well-established behaviours, and thus supporting vital stewardship efforts in an era of increased antimicrobial resistance. Future work will need to focus on the direct impact on drug prescriptions as well as identifying barriers to implementing smartphone apps in other clinical settings.
我院将提供便携式抗菌药物处方指南的形式从纸质口袋指南改为智能手机应用程序(应用)。我们利用这个机会评估了其使用与抗菌药物处方者的态度和行为之间的关系。
我们在智能手机应用程序推出前和推出后3个月分别使用了2份结构化横断面调查问卷。对使用频率和同意声明的有序李克特量表回答允许对变量之间的关系进行定量评估。
智能手机应用程序的使用频率高于其所取代的口袋指南(p < 0.01),其使用增加与认为该应用程序有用、易于操作且内容相关的观点有关。使用该应用程序更频繁的用户更有可能同意该应用程序鼓励他们对同事的不适当处方提出质疑(p = 0.001),并且更了解抗菌药物管理的重要性(p = 0.005)。应用程序使用减少与同意高级医师对抗菌药物处方的偏好会不顾指南建议而推翻有关(p = 0.0002)。
智能手机应用程序是提供抗菌药物处方指南的一种有效且可接受的形式。我们的研究结果表明,它们可能使用户有能力挑战不正确的处方,打破既定行为,从而在抗菌药物耐药性增加的时代支持重要的管理工作。未来的工作需要关注对药物处方的直接影响,以及确定在其他临床环境中实施智能手机应用程序的障碍。