Shen J Q, Ji Q, Ding W J, Xia L M, Zhao D, Liu C, Sun Y X, Wang C S
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Nov 3;100(40):3141-3146. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200321-00875.
To compare the effect of myotomy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) to treat symptomatic myocardial bridges (MBs) of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). From January 2009 to December 2017, a total of 54 eligible patients [34 males, 20 females, with a median age of 60 (51, 64) years old] with symptomatic MBs of LAD who underwent myotomy (31 patients) or CABG (23 patients) at the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were included in the study. Surgical effect of the two groups were compared and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). No significant differences between the two groups were observed with respect to age, gender, risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD), symptoms, angiographic findings of MBs and preoperative cardiac status, and 0 surgery-associated death was observed. Among the 31 myotomy patients, 4 patients underwent off-pump myotomy (including one patient who underwent urgent conversion from off-pump to on-pump surgery due to massive hemorrhaging secondary to the right ventricular perforation), and the remaining 27 cases received myotomy under cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest. All 23 bypass surgery patients underwent off-pump CABG surgery with in situ left internal mammary artery (LIMA) grafting to the distal LAD. After LIMA grafting, the median graft flow was 14 (11, 20) ml/min. During a median follow-up of 26 months, 11 patients developed MACEs (7.4% for myotomy vs 40.9% for bypass surgery, 0.007). Surgical strategy (CABG surgery vs myotomy) was an independent risk factor for MACE (3.681, 95% 1.812-8.685, 0.011). Compared with myotomy, CABG surgery had a significantly higher incidence of adverse angiographic results (3.7% of residual compression vs 40.9% of LIMA graft failure, 0.003). Among 10 CABG surgery patients with LAD-MBs and proximal coronary obstruction, all LIMA grafts were patent, though one case reported recurrent angina pectoris 2 years after the surgery which was relieved after drug therapy. For patients with symtomatic LAD-MBs, myotomy may be associated with favorable mid-term outcomes and angiographic results. However, CABG surgery should be recommended for those with concomitant proximal obstruction of LAD.
比较心肌切开术与冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)治疗左前降支(LAD)有症状心肌桥(MBs)的效果。2009年1月至2017年12月,复旦大学附属中山医院心血管外科共纳入54例符合条件的LAD有症状MBs患者[男性34例,女性20例,中位年龄60(51,64)岁],其中31例行心肌切开术,23例行CABG。比较两组手术效果,并采用多因素logistic回归模型分析主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的危险因素。两组在年龄、性别、冠状动脉疾病(CAD)危险因素、症状、MBs血管造影表现及术前心脏状态方面无显著差异,且未观察到手术相关死亡。31例心肌切开术患者中,4例接受非体外循环心肌切开术(其中1例因右心室穿孔继发大出血,由非体外循环紧急转为体外循环手术),其余27例在体外循环心脏停跳下接受心肌切开术。23例旁路手术患者均接受非体外循环CABG手术,采用原位左乳内动脉(LIMA)移植至LAD远端。LIMA移植后,移植血管平均血流量为14(11,20)ml/min。中位随访26个月期间,11例患者发生MACE(心肌切开术组为7.4%,旁路手术组为40.9%,P = 0.007)。手术策略(CABG手术与心肌切开术)是MACE的独立危险因素(3.681,95%可信区间1.812 - 8.685,P = 0.011)。与心肌切开术相比,CABG手术不良血管造影结果发生率显著更高(残余压迫为3.7%,LIMA移植失败为40.9%,P = 0.003)。10例LAD - MBs合并近端冠状动脉阻塞的CABG手术患者中,所有LIMA移植血管均通畅,尽管有1例术后2年报告复发性心绞痛,经药物治疗后缓解。对于有症状的LAD - MBs患者,心肌切开术可能与良好的中期结局和血管造影结果相关。然而,对于合并LAD近端阻塞的患者,应推荐CABG手术。