Suppr超能文献

老年人身体和心理结果与消费者可穿戴设备活动结果的共同校准:coQoL方法的评估

Co-Calibrating Physical and Psychological Outcomes and Consumer Wearable Activity Outcomes in Older Adults: An Evaluation of the coQoL Method.

作者信息

Manea Vlad, Wac Katarzyna

机构信息

Quality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 41, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Quality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Route de Drize 7, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2020 Oct 31;10(4):203. doi: 10.3390/jpm10040203.

Abstract

Inactivity, lack of sleep, and poor nutrition predispose individuals to health risks. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) assess physical behaviours and psychological states but are subject of self-reporting biases. Conversely, wearables are an increasingly accurate source of behavioural Technology-Reported Outcomes (TechROs). However, the extent to which PROs and TechROs provide convergent information is unknown. We propose the coQoL PRO-TechRO co-calibration method and report its feasibility, reliability, and human factors influencing data quality. Thirty-nine seniors provided 7.4 ± 4.4 PROs for physical activity (IPAQ), social support (MSPSS), anxiety/depression (GADS), nutrition (PREDIMED, SelfMNA), memory (MFE), sleep (PSQI), Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L), and 295 ± 238 days of TechROs (Fitbit Charge 2) along two years. We co-calibrated PROs and TechROs by Spearman rank and reported human factors guiding coQoL use. We report high PRO-TechRO correlations (rS≥ 0.8) for physical activity (moderate domestic activity-light+fair active duration), social support (family help-fair activity), anxiety/depression (numeric score-sleep duration), or sleep (duration to sleep-sleep duration) at various durations (7-120 days). coQoL feasibly co-calibrates constructs within physical behaviours and psychological states in seniors. Our results can inform designs of longitudinal observations and, whenever appropriate, personalized behavioural interventions.

摘要

缺乏运动、睡眠不足和营养不良会使个体面临健康风险。患者报告结局(PROs)评估身体行为和心理状态,但存在自我报告偏差。相反,可穿戴设备是行为技术报告结局(TechROs)越来越准确的来源。然而,PROs和TechROs提供趋同信息的程度尚不清楚。我们提出了共同生活质量PRO-TechRO共同校准方法,并报告了其可行性、可靠性以及影响数据质量的人为因素。39名老年人在两年内提供了7.4±4.4个关于身体活动(国际体力活动问卷,IPAQ)、社会支持(多维社会支持感知量表,MSPSS)、焦虑/抑郁(广泛性焦虑和抑郁量表,GADS)、营养(地中海饮食预防医学研究组饮食模式,PREDIMED;微型营养评定法自评版,SelfMNA)、记忆(记忆功能评估,MFE)、睡眠(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,PSQI)、生活质量(欧洲五维度健康量表,EQ-5D-3L)的PROs,以及295±238天的TechROs(Fitbit Charge 2)。我们通过斯皮尔曼等级对PROs和TechROs进行了共同校准,并报告了指导共同生活质量使用的人为因素。我们报告了在不同时间段(7-120天)内,身体活动(适度家务活动-轻度+中等活跃持续时间)、社会支持(家庭帮助-中等活动)、焦虑/抑郁(数字评分-睡眠时间)或睡眠(入睡时间-睡眠时间)的PRO-TechRO高相关性(rS≥0.8)。共同生活质量能够切实可行地对老年人身体行为和心理状态中的各项指标进行共同校准。我们的结果可为纵向观察设计提供参考,并在适当的时候为个性化行为干预提供依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2b4/7759248/ee0f653ea29a/jpm-10-00203-g0A1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验