Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Otolaryngology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jan;9(1):1-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.036. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, medical trainees have faced unique challenges and uncertainties. To capture the experiences of allergy and immunology fellows throughout the United States and Canada during this time, a 17-item electronic questionnaire was distributed to 380 fellow-in-training (FIT) members of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology enrolled in US and Canadian allergy/immunology fellowship programs. Voluntary and anonymous responses were collected from April 15 to May 15, 2020. In addition to summary statistics, categorical data were compared using χ tests (Fisher's exact). Responses were obtained from FITs across all years of training and primary specialties (Internal Medicine, Pediatrics, and Medicine-Pediatrics) with a response rate of 32.6% (124 of 380). Reassignment to COVID-19 clinical responsibilities was reported by 12% (15 of 124) of FITs, with the largest proportion in the US northeast region. A majority of FITs used telehealth (95%) and virtual learning (82%) during the pandemic. Overall, 21% (25 of 120) of FITs expressed concern about potentially lacking clinical experience for independently practicing allergy and immunology. However, FITs using telehealth reported lower concern compared with those who did not (18.4% [21 of 114] vs 66.7% [4 of 6]; P = .01). The survey shows that allergy and immunology trainee experiences have varied considerably since the COVID-19 outbreak. Notably, the adoption of telehealth and virtual learning was commonly reported, and optimization of these virtual experiences will be helpful. Even outside of pandemics, training on the use of telemedicine may be a sound strategy in preparation for future health care delivery and unexpected events.
由于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)全球大流行,医学受训人员面临着独特的挑战和不确定性。为了了解美国和加拿大各地过敏和免疫学研究员在此期间的经历,向美国过敏、哮喘和免疫学学会(American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology)的 380 名接受培训的研究员(fellow-in-training,FIT)成员分发了一份 17 项的电子问卷,这些研究员在美国和加拿大的过敏/免疫学研究员培训计划中注册。从 2020 年 4 月 15 日至 5 月 15 日,收集了自愿和匿名的回复。除了总结统计数据外,还使用卡方检验(Fisher 确切检验)比较了分类数据。回复来自所有培训年份和主要专业(内科、儿科和内科-儿科)的 FIT,回复率为 32.6%(380 人中的 124 人)。12%(15/124)的 FIT 被重新分配到 COVID-19 临床工作中,其中美国东北部地区的比例最大。在大流行期间,大多数 FIT 使用了远程医疗(95%)和虚拟学习(82%)。总体而言,21%(120 人中的 25 人)的 FIT 表示担心可能缺乏独立从事过敏和免疫学实践的临床经验。然而,与没有使用远程医疗的 FIT 相比,使用远程医疗的 FIT 报告的担忧程度较低(18.4%[21/114]比 66.7%[4/6];P=0.01)。该调查显示,自 COVID-19 爆发以来,过敏和免疫学受训人员的经历有很大差异。值得注意的是,远程医疗和虚拟学习的采用得到了广泛报道,优化这些虚拟体验将有所帮助。即使在大流行之外,培训使用远程医疗也可能是为未来医疗保健提供和意外事件做好准备的明智策略。