Raineri Margherita, Tammiksaar Erki
Centre for Science Studies, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Veski St. 4, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
, Via Galata 20/10, 16121, Genoa, Italy.
Theory Biosci. 2021 Feb;140(1):45-75. doi: 10.1007/s12064-020-00325-3. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
In 1835, the meaning of the cleavage furrows in the division of frog eggs was the cause of a heated argument between the Italian naturalist Mauro Rusconi and Karl Ernst von Baer. These furrows were first described by Prévost and Dumas (Ann Sci Nat 2:100-121, 129-149, 1824b) who did not realize they cut the egg into separate masses. Rusconi (Développement de la grenouille comune depuis le moment de sa naissance jusque a son état parfait, Giusti, Milano, 1826) hypothesized a connection between the furrows and a peculiar crystallization of the content of the egg which eventually produced elementary molecules as the building blocks of the embryo. von Baer (Arch Anat Phys Wiss Med 6:481-509, 1834) was the first to establish a link between the furrows and an active process of dichotomous division he considered to be the basis for all further development and differentiation. The present paper analyses the theoretical reasons behind these divergent interpretations and focuses attention on their implications for the development of the cell theory and the conceptions of life. Prévost, Dumas and Rusconi interpreted cleavage and the whole embryonic development in the light of eighteenth-century scientific theories and the French materialism of the early nineteenth century, which explained life in terms of ordered molecular movement. Starting from other premises partly rooted in German philosophy von Baer (1834) gave a totally different picture which anticipated the cell theory and modern embryology.
1835年,蛙卵分裂时卵裂沟的意义引发了意大利博物学家毛罗·鲁斯科尼和卡尔·恩斯特·冯·贝尔之间的激烈争论。这些卵裂沟最早由普雷沃斯特和迪马(《自然科学年鉴》2:100 - 121,129 - 149,1824b)描述,他们并未意识到这些卵裂沟会将卵切成独立的团块。鲁斯科尼(《普通青蛙从出生到发育成熟的发育过程》,朱斯蒂出版社,米兰,1826年)推测卵裂沟与卵内容物的一种特殊结晶有关,这种结晶最终产生作为胚胎构建块的基本分子。冯·贝尔(《解剖学、生理学和医学科学档案》6:481 - 509,1834年)首次将卵裂沟与一种二分分裂的活跃过程联系起来,他认为这是所有进一步发育和分化的基础。本文分析了这些不同解释背后的理论原因,并将注意力集中在它们对细胞学说发展和生命观念的影响上。普雷沃斯特、迪马和鲁斯科尼根据18世纪的科学理论和19世纪早期的法国唯物主义来解释卵裂和整个胚胎发育,这些理论用有序的分子运动来解释生命。冯·贝尔(1834年)从部分植根于德国哲学的其他前提开始,给出了一幅截然不同的图景,这一图景预见了细胞学说和现代胚胎学。