Esses B A, Jafek B W
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver 80262.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987 Sep-Oct;96(5):519-24. doi: 10.1177/000348948709600508.
In an attempt to evaluate cricothyroidotomy as described by Brantigan and Grow in 1976, the authors have reviewed the literature and compared it to the decade of experience following Brantigan and Grow's report. The records of over 1,000 patients requiring ventilatory assistance were reviewed. A comparison of this experience with Brantigan and Grow's original series and subsequent reports was used to establish the criteria and technique for cricothyroidotomy. It appears that while cricothyroidotomy has specific advantages, it also has disadvantages and a higher incidence of airway stenosis than either of the procedures it was designed to replace (low tracheotomy or endotracheal intubation). For this reason, its use has been severely restricted in Colorado, where it was popularized.
为了评估布兰特igan和格罗于1976年描述的环甲膜切开术,作者查阅了相关文献,并将其与布兰特igan和格罗报告后的十年经验进行了比较。回顾了1000多名需要通气辅助患者的记录。将这一经验与布兰特igan和格罗的原始系列及后续报告进行比较,以确定环甲膜切开术的标准和技术。似乎环甲膜切开术虽然有特定优势,但也有缺点,且气道狭窄发生率高于其旨在替代的两种手术(低位气管切开术或气管插管)中的任何一种。因此,在其曾被推广的科罗拉多州,其使用已受到严格限制。