SkÁla-Rosenbaum J, DŽupa V, Krbec M
Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha.
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(5):309-317.
Periprosthetic femoral fractures around the femoral stem of a hip prosthesis constitute a serious challenge. The number of these fractures, associated with a high failure rate and a high number of overall complications, including higher mortality, has been on an increase worldwide. Stable femoral stems are indicated for osteosynthesis, while in case of loosening the method of choice is the replacement by a revision implant. The aim of osteosynthesis of periprosthetic femoral fractures is a stable fixation with soft tissue preservation which results in faster union allowing the patient to return to pre-injury activities. Biomechanical studies on cadavers or on synthetic models and computer simulations make it possible to evaluate the fixation strength in various types of implants in dependence on fracture characteristics and bone quality, but cannot be substituted for clinical trials since there is no direct proportion between fixation rigidity and fracture union. Fundamental principles that shall be followed in osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures can be deduced from the available studies. Proximal fixation by screws or a combination of screws and cables are biomechanically more advantageous than the Ogden fixation by cerclage wires or cables. Bicortical fixation enabled by state-of-the-art implants of LAP-LCP or NCB type represents a significantly more stable construction compared to monocortical fixation and led to reduced use of structural allografts. Better stability can be achieved by "double plating" technique which is applied especially in revision surgeries, but also in osteoporotic periprosthetic fractures with a defect zone. In these cases, osteosynthesis with long plates is recommended, bridging the entire femur, i.e. distally with femoral condyles fixation since this prevents the risk of a fracture below the plate. In shorter plates, this risk created by stress concentration at the end screw is amplified when a distal bicortical locking screw is used. That is why it is beneficial to reduce this stress by a monocortical screw or with the use of a conventional screw. Adherence to the principles regarding the position, type and number of screws constitutes the key parameter of successful osteosynthesis of periprosthetic fractures. Key words: hip joint, arthroplasty, periprosthetic fractures, biomechanics of osteosynthesis.
髋关节假体股骨干周围的假体周围股骨骨折是一项严峻挑战。这类骨折的数量在全球范围内呈上升趋势,其失败率高,总体并发症数量多,包括更高的死亡率。对于稳定的股骨干,适合进行骨合成,而在假体松动的情况下,首选方法是用翻修植入物进行置换。假体周围股骨骨折骨合成的目的是在保留软组织的情况下实现稳定固定,从而实现更快的愈合,使患者能够恢复到受伤前的活动水平。在尸体或合成模型上进行的生物力学研究以及计算机模拟,使得根据骨折特征和骨质来评估各种类型植入物的固定强度成为可能,但由于固定刚度与骨折愈合之间不存在直接比例关系,因此不能替代临床试验。从现有研究中可以推断出假体周围骨折骨合成应遵循的基本原则。通过螺钉或螺钉与缆线组合进行近端固定在生物力学上比用环扎钢丝或缆线进行奥格登固定更具优势。与单皮质固定相比,采用LAP-LCP或NCB型的先进植入物实现的双皮质固定代表着一种明显更稳定的结构,并减少了结构性同种异体骨移植的使用。通过“双钢板”技术可以实现更好的稳定性,该技术尤其适用于翻修手术,也适用于有缺损区的骨质疏松性假体周围骨折。在这些情况下,建议使用长钢板进行骨合成,跨越整个股骨,即远端固定在股骨髁上,因为这样可以防止钢板下方骨折的风险。在较短的钢板中,当使用远端双皮质锁定螺钉时,末端螺钉处应力集中所产生的这种风险会被放大。这就是为什么用单皮质螺钉或使用传统螺钉来降低这种应力是有益的。遵循关于螺钉位置、类型和数量的原则是假体周围骨折成功骨合成的关键参数。关键词:髋关节、关节成形术、假体周围骨折、骨合成生物力学