PhD en Epidemiología. Investigador I-A del Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). Profesor Titular jubilado, Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia. Profesor Visitante, Instituto de Estudios Avançados, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.
Salud Colect. 2020 Sep 11;16:e2786. doi: 10.18294/sc.2020.2786.
In this essay, I explore methodological as well as theoretical implications of an ethno-epidemiological approach, aiming to integrate research findings in mental health into new conceptual models. With this objective, I first evaluate the roots and uses of the term "ethnoepidemiology" to designate three research strategies for scientific knowledge production: type I (studies of sociocultural risk factors and ethnically defined risk groups); type II (studies of lay models of distribution and occurrence of illness in populations); type III (ethnographic studies of projects and areas of epidemiologic research). As an illustration, selected methodological features of three studies in which I have participated are presented and discussed. I then elaborate upon methodological developments derived from this experience of doing research, generating new models for transcultural transdisciplinary research of mental health practices. Lastly, I comment on some broad implications of studying mental health problems from an integrated ethnographical and epidemiological point of view, in diverse and deeply unequal societies such as those of contemporary Latin America.
在本文中,我探讨了民族流行病学方法的方法论和理论意义,旨在将心理健康研究成果纳入新的概念模型。为此,我首先评估了“民族流行病学”一词的根源和用途,将其指定为三种科学知识生产的研究策略:I 型(社会文化危险因素和民族定义的风险群体研究);II 型(人群中疾病分布和发生的通俗模型研究);III 型(流行病学研究项目和领域的民族志研究)。作为说明,本文介绍和讨论了我参与的三项研究中的选定方法特征。然后,我详细阐述了从这种研究经验中得出的方法论发展,为心理健康实践的跨文化跨学科研究生成了新的模型。最后,我从综合民族志和流行病学的角度评论了在当代拉丁美洲等多样化和严重不平等的社会中研究心理健康问题的一些广泛影响。