Department of Forensic Medicine, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China; Forensic Judicial Appraisal Center of Beijing Public Security Bureau, Beijing, 100192, China.
Forensic Judicial Appraisal Center of Beijing Public Security Bureau, Beijing, 100192, China.
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Dec;317:110552. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110552. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
In the field of criminal investigations, in the event that a body is found in water, the ability to differentiate whether the cause of death was drowning or the body was murdered then dumped into water elsewhere is difficult but important for case detection. Detecting diatoms in human organs can be used to effectively identify if the cause of death was drowning. At present, diatom detection methods are roughly divided into morphological and molecular detection methods, but both methods have different limitations. In this study, a total of 79 samples from 23 victims in 19 known drowning deaths were collected. The diatom morphological identification combined with DNA metabarcoding technology was used to compare the reliability of the diatom detection method. Microscopic observations revealed that the positive detection rate of diatoms was 52.6 %, 26.3 % and 58.8 % respectively in the kidney, liver and lung samples. DNA metabarcoding analysis found that the positive detection rate of diatoms was 31.6 %, 31.6 % and 35.3 % respectively in kidney, liver and lung samples. When compared with barcode BacirbcL, barcode 18S605 detected more diatoms, while diatoms in BacirbcL were more consistent with environmental samples. The comparative analysis found that microscopic observations were not highly correlated with the identification results of DNA barcoding technology. There were no obvious differences in the effect of internal organs on diatom enrichment, and different organs should be tested at the same time. At present, the DNA barcode reference sequence is gravely insufficient and has many errors, which leads to restrictions in the application of this technology, resulting in many OTU not being accurately identified. This explains why the success rate of molecular identification is not higher than that of microscopic identification. Construction of a reliable diatom DNA barcode reference sequence database is an urgent task for drowning forensics.
在刑事侦查领域,如果在水中发现尸体,区分死因是溺水还是被谋杀后抛尸于其他地方是困难但重要的侦查环节。检测人体器官中的硅藻可有效判断死因是否为溺水。目前,硅藻检测方法大致可分为形态学和分子检测方法,但两种方法都存在不同的局限性。本研究共采集了 19 例已知溺水死亡案例中 23 名受害者的 79 个样本。采用硅藻形态学鉴定结合 DNA metabarcoding 技术,比较了硅藻检测方法的可靠性。显微镜观察发现,肾脏、肝脏和肺组织样本中硅藻的阳性检出率分别为 52.6%、26.3%和 58.8%。DNA metabarcoding 分析发现,肾脏、肝脏和肺组织样本中硅藻的阳性检出率分别为 31.6%、31.6%和 35.3%。与 barcode BacirbcL 相比,barcode 18S605 检测到的硅藻更多,而 BacirbcL 中的硅藻与环境样本更为一致。对比分析发现,显微镜观察与 DNA 条码技术鉴定结果相关性不高。内部器官对硅藻富集的影响无明显差异,应同时检测不同器官。目前,DNA 条码参考序列严重不足且存在较多错误,限制了该技术的应用,导致许多 OTU 无法准确识别。这解释了为什么分子鉴定的成功率没有比显微镜鉴定高。建立可靠的硅藻 DNA 条码参考序列数据库是溺水法医鉴定的当务之急。