文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

一项关于正畸研究中患者和公众参与(PPIE)报告的研究。

A study of the reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in orthodontic research.

机构信息

Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Hillyard MacDonald, Inverness, UK.

出版信息

J Orthod. 2021 Mar;48(1):42-51. doi: 10.1177/1465312520968574. Epub 2020 Nov 5.


DOI:10.1177/1465312520968574
PMID:33148112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8042522/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in research is an essential component of high-quality research. Patients and the public can identify which research topics are most relevant to them, contribute to study design, and interpretation and dissemination of findings. While inclusion of PPIE is widely adopted in medical research, awareness within the dental research community is more limited. AIM: To examine patient and public involvement and engagement in orthodontic research activity. DESIGN: Identification and appraisal of use of PPIE in orthodontic research reporting and funding applications using a systematic approach. METHODS: Three sources of information were examined: (1) research articles published between September 2018 and September 2019 in four major orthodontic journals. Articles were examined for reported PPIE; (2) common funding bodies for orthodontic research were assessed to establish whether PPIE was mandated (National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, Chief Scientist Office (Scotland), Health and Care Research Wales, British Orthodontic Society Foundation, Royal College of Surgeons and CLEFT); and (3) publication guidance for authors in these journals was examined to identify whether reporting of PPIE was included. RESULTS: Of the 363 research articles, 2 (0.6%) mention patient/public involvement. None of the 363 research articles mention patient/public engagement. Of nine funding bodies, 2 (22%) request evidence of patient/public involvement as a condition of receiving funding with one (11%) expecting evidence of public engagement to be provided as a condition of receiving funding. None of the four major orthodontic journals include patient/public involvement and/or engagement in their guidance for authors. CONCLUSION: There is currently: (1) a notable lack of reporting of PPIE in orthodontic research; (2) variability in the requirements of funding bodies for researchers to include PPIE in funding applications and throughout the research process; and (3) no stipulation in journals' instructions for authors.

摘要

简介:患者和公众参与(PPIE)研究是高质量研究的重要组成部分。患者和公众可以确定哪些研究主题与他们最相关,为研究设计以及研究结果的解释和传播做出贡献。虽然 PPIE 在医学研究中得到广泛应用,但在牙科研究界的认识更为有限。

目的:调查正畸研究活动中的患者和公众参与情况。

设计:采用系统方法识别和评估正畸研究报告和资助申请中使用的 PPIE。

方法:检查了三种信息来源:(1)2018 年 9 月至 2019 年 9 月在四家主要正畸期刊上发表的研究文章。检查了报告的 PPIE;(2)评估了常见的正畸研究资助机构,以确定是否要求 PPIE(英国国家卫生研究院、医学研究委员会、惠康信托基金会、苏格兰首席科学家办公室、威尔士健康与护理研究委员会、英国正畸学会基金会、皇家外科医师学院和 CLEFT);(3)检查这些期刊的作者出版指南,以确定是否包括 PPIE 报告。

结果:在 363 篇研究文章中,有 2 篇(0.6%)提到了患者/公众参与。在 363 篇研究文章中,没有一篇提到患者/公众参与。在九个资助机构中,有 2 个(22%)要求将患者/公众参与作为获得资助的条件之一,其中 1 个(11%)要求在获得资助的条件下提供公众参与的证据。在四个主要的正畸期刊中,没有一个包括患者/公众参与和/或参与他们的作者指南。

结论:目前存在以下问题:(1)正畸研究中 PPIE 的报告明显不足;(2)资助机构要求研究人员在资助申请和整个研究过程中纳入 PPIE 的要求存在差异;(3)期刊作者指南中没有规定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a072/8042522/83ffdf5c7201/10.1177_1465312520968574-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a072/8042522/83ffdf5c7201/10.1177_1465312520968574-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a072/8042522/83ffdf5c7201/10.1177_1465312520968574-fig1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
A study of the reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in orthodontic research.

J Orthod. 2021-3

[2]
Reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in clinical trials published in nursing science journals: a descriptive study.

Res Involv Engagem. 2021-12-14

[3]
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in a doctoral research project exploring self-harm in older adults.

Health Expect. 2019-8

[4]
Understanding who is and isn't involved and engaged in health research: capturing and analysing demographic data to diversify patient and public involvement and engagement.

Res Involv Engagem. 2023-5-8

[5]
Children and young people's contributions to public involvement and engagement activities in health-related research: A scoping review.

PLoS One. 2021

[6]
Establishment of a patient and public involvement and engagement group to support clinical trials in Pakistan: Initial lessons learned.

Res Involv Engagem. 2024-9-27

[7]
Patient and public involvement and engagement with underserved communities in dementia research: Reporting on a partnership to co-design a website for postdiagnostic dementia support.

Health Expect. 2024-2

[8]
Using the UK standards for public involvement to evaluate the public involvement sections of annual reports from NIHR managed research centres.

Res Involv Engagem. 2023-11-30

[9]
Reflections of patient and public involvement from a commissioned research project evaluating a nationally implemented NHS programme focused on diabetes prevention.

Res Involv Engagem. 2023-6-14

[10]
Co-creating a patient and public involvement and engagement 'how to' guide for researchers.

Res Involv Engagem. 2020-6-17

引用本文的文献

[1]
Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on which potential prognostic factors for failure of total elbow replacement should be investigated.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-8-30

[2]
Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025-7-8

[3]
CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials.

BMJ. 2025-4-14

[4]
Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-4-26

[5]
Public involvement in Australian clinical trials: A systematic review.

Clin Trials. 2024-8

[6]
Patient and public involvement in pragmatic trials: online survey of corresponding authors of published trials.

CMAJ Open. 2023-9-19

[7]
Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials-a systematic review.

Trials. 2023-5-31

[8]
Reporting of patient involvement: a mixed-methods analysis of current practice in health research publications using a targeted search strategy.

BMJ Open. 2023-1-20

[9]
How common is patient and public involvement (PPI)? Cross-sectional analysis of frequency of PPI reporting in health research papers and associations with methods, funding sources and other factors.

BMJ Open. 2022-5-24

[10]
Reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in clinical trials published in nursing science journals: a descriptive study.

Res Involv Engagem. 2021-12-14

本文引用的文献

[1]
Information retention of orthodontic patients and parents: A randomized controlled trial.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019-8

[2]
How people make decisions about whether or not to seek orthodontic care: Upstream in the treatment chain.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019-6

[3]
Shared decision-making in orthodontics: Are we there yet?

J Orthod. 2019-6

[4]
Evaluating patient and public involvement in research.

BMJ. 2018-12-6

[5]
Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study.

BMJ Open. 2018-3-23

[6]
GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

Res Involv Engagem. 2017-8-2

[7]
'Is it worth doing?' Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research.

Res Involv Engagem. 2015-7-31

[8]
Towards a pedagogy for patient and public involvement in medical education.

Med Educ. 2016-1

[9]
Involving the public in research.

Br Dent J. 2014-10

[10]
Quality of reporting on patient and public involvement within surgical research: a systematic review.

Ann Surg. 2015-2

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索