• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

报告 PPI 和 MCID 在 III/IV 期随机对照试验中的应用——系统综述。

Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials-a systematic review.

机构信息

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.

Tumour Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 May 31;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07367-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07367-0
PMID:37259102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10233858/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical trial design contributes to ensuring the research objectives and outcome measures are relevant to patients. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the primary outcome influences trial design and feasibility and should be predicated on PPI. We aimed to determine current practice of reporting PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Following a search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, we included primary publications of phase III/IV RCTs, in English, inclusive of any medical specialty or type of intervention, that reported a health-related outcome. We excluded protocols and secondary publications of RCTs. We extracted RCT characteristics, the use of PPI, and use of the MCID.

RESULTS

Between 1 July 2019 and 13 January 2020, 123 phase III/IV RCTs matched our eligibility criteria. Ninety percent evaluated a medical rather than surgical intervention. Oncology accounted for 21% of all included RCTs. Only 2.4% (n = 3) and 1.6% (n = 2) RCTs described PPI and the MCID respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI and the MCID are poorly reported, so it is uncertain how these contributed to trial design. Improvement in the reporting of these items would increase confidence that results are relevant and clinically significant to patients, contributing to improving the overall trial design.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not registered.

摘要

背景

患者和公众参与临床试验设计有助于确保研究目标和结果衡量指标与患者相关。主要结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)影响试验设计和可行性,并且应该基于患者和公众参与。我们旨在确定在 III 期/IV 期随机对照试验(RCT)中报告患者和公众参与和 MCID 的当前实践。

方法

在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库进行搜索后,我们纳入了报告与健康相关结局的 III 期/IV 期 RCT 的主要出版物,包括任何医学专业或干预类型,以英文发表,包含 RCT 的特征、患者和公众参与的使用以及 MCID 的使用。

结果

2019 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 13 日,有 123 项符合我们纳入标准的 III 期/IV 期 RCT。90%评估的是医学干预而非手术干预。肿瘤学占所有纳入 RCT 的 21%。只有 2.4%(n=3)和 1.6%(n=2)的 RCT 分别描述了患者和公众参与以及 MCID。

结论

患者和公众参与以及 MCID 的报告都很差,因此不确定它们如何影响试验设计。这些项目报告的改进将提高对结果与患者相关且具有临床意义的信心,有助于改进整体试验设计。

试验注册

未注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0383/10233858/b1be7f694d2f/13063_2023_7367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0383/10233858/b1be7f694d2f/13063_2023_7367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0383/10233858/b1be7f694d2f/13063_2023_7367_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials-a systematic review.报告 PPI 和 MCID 在 III/IV 期随机对照试验中的应用——系统综述。
Trials. 2023 May 31;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07367-0.
2
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.月经性(与月经相关)癫痫发作的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 16;9(9):CD013225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013225.pub3.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
6
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).吸气肌训练,联合或不联合肺康复治疗,用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 6;1(1):CD013778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013778.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
10
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.放疗或放射外科手术后脑放射性坏死的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 9;7(7):CD011492. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011492.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparity between statistical significance and clinical importance in published randomised controlled trials: a methodological study.已发表的随机对照试验中统计学显著性与临床重要性之间的差异:一项方法学研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 25;15(8):e100411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100411.
2
Beyond statistical significance: Embracing minimal clinically important difference for better patient care.超越统计学意义:接受最小临床重要差异以提供更好的患者护理。
World J Methodol. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):97814. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i1.97814.
3
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in the Development of a Platform Clinical Trial for Parkinson's Disease: An Evaluation Protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in clinical trials published in nursing science journals: a descriptive study.护理科学期刊发表的临床试验中患者及公众参与和介入(PPIE)情况的报告:一项描述性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Dec 14;7(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00331-9.
2
Patient and public involvement in randomised clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a clinical trials unit to identify good practice, barriers and facilitators.患者和公众参与随机临床试验:一项临床试验单位的混合方法研究,旨在确定良好实践、障碍和促进因素。
Trials. 2021 Oct 23;22(1):735. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05701-y.
3
Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers.
患者和公众参与帕金森病平台临床试验的开发:评估方案。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2024;14(4):809-821. doi: 10.3233/JPD-230444.
4
Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size.检测什么的能力?规划和评估样本量的考虑因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Aug;28(3):276-301. doi: 10.1177/10888683241228328. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
研究出版物中患者及公众参与(PPI)的报告:与非专业共同研究者使用GRIPP2清单
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 22;7(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00295-w.
4
Patient and Public Involvement Within Orthopaedic Research: A Systematic Review.患者和公众参与骨科研究:系统评价。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 7;103(13):e51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01573.
5
Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review.知识综合中患者和公众伙伴作者身份的识别与报告:快速回顾
J Particip Med. 2021 Jun 10;13(2):e27141. doi: 10.2196/27141.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
A study of the reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in orthodontic research.一项关于正畸研究中患者和公众参与(PPIE)报告的研究。
J Orthod. 2021 Mar;48(1):42-51. doi: 10.1177/1465312520968574. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis.临床试验中患者报告结局(PRO)数据的影响:系统评价和批判性分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Oct 16;17(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1220-z.
9
Effect of Behavioral and Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy Combined With Surgery vs Surgery Alone on Incontinence Symptoms Among Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence: The ESTEEM Randomized Clinical Trial.行为和盆底肌治疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗混合性尿失禁女性患者的尿失禁症状的效果:ESTEEM 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Sep 17;322(11):1066-1076. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.12467.
10
Patient and public involvement in health research: A Nordic perspective.患者和公众参与健康研究:北欧视角。
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Feb;48(1):119-121. doi: 10.1177/1403494819863522. Epub 2019 Aug 29.