文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

报告 PPI 和 MCID 在 III/IV 期随机对照试验中的应用——系统综述。

Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials-a systematic review.

机构信息

Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK.

Tumour Centre of Excellence, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Brain, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 May 31;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07367-0.


DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07367-0
PMID:37259102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10233858/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) in clinical trial design contributes to ensuring the research objectives and outcome measures are relevant to patients. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the primary outcome influences trial design and feasibility and should be predicated on PPI. We aimed to determine current practice of reporting PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Following a search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, we included primary publications of phase III/IV RCTs, in English, inclusive of any medical specialty or type of intervention, that reported a health-related outcome. We excluded protocols and secondary publications of RCTs. We extracted RCT characteristics, the use of PPI, and use of the MCID. RESULTS: Between 1 July 2019 and 13 January 2020, 123 phase III/IV RCTs matched our eligibility criteria. Ninety percent evaluated a medical rather than surgical intervention. Oncology accounted for 21% of all included RCTs. Only 2.4% (n = 3) and 1.6% (n = 2) RCTs described PPI and the MCID respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PPI and the MCID are poorly reported, so it is uncertain how these contributed to trial design. Improvement in the reporting of these items would increase confidence that results are relevant and clinically significant to patients, contributing to improving the overall trial design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not registered.

摘要

背景:患者和公众参与临床试验设计有助于确保研究目标和结果衡量指标与患者相关。主要结局的最小临床重要差异(MCID)影响试验设计和可行性,并且应该基于患者和公众参与。我们旨在确定在 III 期/IV 期随机对照试验(RCT)中报告患者和公众参与和 MCID 的当前实践。

方法:在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库进行搜索后,我们纳入了报告与健康相关结局的 III 期/IV 期 RCT 的主要出版物,包括任何医学专业或干预类型,以英文发表,包含 RCT 的特征、患者和公众参与的使用以及 MCID 的使用。

结果:2019 年 7 月 1 日至 2020 年 1 月 13 日,有 123 项符合我们纳入标准的 III 期/IV 期 RCT。90%评估的是医学干预而非手术干预。肿瘤学占所有纳入 RCT 的 21%。只有 2.4%(n=3)和 1.6%(n=2)的 RCT 分别描述了患者和公众参与以及 MCID。

结论:患者和公众参与以及 MCID 的报告都很差,因此不确定它们如何影响试验设计。这些项目报告的改进将提高对结果与患者相关且具有临床意义的信心,有助于改进整体试验设计。

试验注册:未注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0383/10233858/b1be7f694d2f/13063_2023_7367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0383/10233858/b1be7f694d2f/13063_2023_7367_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0383/10233858/b1be7f694d2f/13063_2023_7367_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Reporting of PPI and the MCID in phase III/IV randomised controlled trials-a systematic review.

Trials. 2023-5-31

[2]
Treatments for seizures in catamenial (menstrual-related) epilepsy.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-9-16

[3]
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-10-3

[4]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22

[5]
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.

Health Technol Assess. 2024-10

[6]
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-6

[7]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9

[8]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[9]
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-11-14

[10]
Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-7-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Disparity between statistical significance and clinical importance in published randomised controlled trials: a methodological study.

BMJ Open. 2025-8-25

[2]
Beyond statistical significance: Embracing minimal clinically important difference for better patient care.

World J Methodol. 2025-3-20

[3]
Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement in the Development of a Platform Clinical Trial for Parkinson's Disease: An Evaluation Protocol.

J Parkinsons Dis. 2024

[4]
Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size.

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in clinical trials published in nursing science journals: a descriptive study.

Res Involv Engagem. 2021-12-14

[2]
Patient and public involvement in randomised clinical trials: a mixed-methods study of a clinical trials unit to identify good practice, barriers and facilitators.

Trials. 2021-10-23

[3]
Reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research publications: using the GRIPP2 checklists with lay co-researchers.

Res Involv Engagem. 2021-7-22

[4]
Patient and Public Involvement Within Orthopaedic Research: A Systematic Review.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021-7-7

[5]
Identification and Reporting of Patient and Public Partner Authorship on Knowledge Syntheses: Rapid Review.

J Particip Med. 2021-6-10

[6]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[7]
A study of the reporting of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in orthodontic research.

J Orthod. 2021-3

[8]
The impact of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from clinical trials: a systematic review and critical analysis.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019-10-16

[9]
Effect of Behavioral and Pelvic Floor Muscle Therapy Combined With Surgery vs Surgery Alone on Incontinence Symptoms Among Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence: The ESTEEM Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA. 2019-9-17

[10]
Patient and public involvement in health research: A Nordic perspective.

Scand J Public Health. 2019-8-29

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索